Sunday, January 31, 2010

Saratoga Shore

(Editor's Note: A version of this column will eventually appear in THE SCENE)

Before it is announced where the second season of the Jersey Shore is going to take place, I’d like to suggest a possible new locale for the show.
They need a place offering a host of different bars. They’ll also require a gym, somewhere to tan and a Laundromat. The show might not need a literal boardwalk, but they will require a corny place to walk around, like an historic Broadway. Ultimately, though, they need a destination with an intangible element that creates a mystical aura as if anything could happen and it probably will. Obviously I’m talking about Saratoga Springs in the summer, bro.
Admittedly the show would probably have a different feel in this environment, but that’s fine. Season two would be one part The Simple Life, one part My Cousin Vinny, a dash of Rodney Dangerfield’s misfit behavior in Caddyshack and a pinch of MTV’s Spring Break.
I can’t be the only one who wants to see what these oddities would do at the racetrack. To conform to the dress code in the boxes I could see “The Situation” wearing a white blazer with no shirt and a pair of rip-away pants from his stripping days. Inevitably Snookie would be emboldened by her jockey-like stature to mount a horse and go for a ride, while lamenting the fact that her horse face scares away riders. Because of “J-Woww’s” inclination to find gorilla juiceheads, racing officials will see if those skills apply to other animals as they utilize her ability to sniff out the racehorses using steroids.
It would be compelling television to see this cast hobnobbing at a Whitney gala, tailgating before a SPAC concert, spoiling themselves with a spa day or interacting with real Italians at Chianti Il Ristorante before they motivate a defamation lawsuit.
It’s the night life of Saratoga Springs where these people would really thrive and come alive. The crew would start at Thirteen, because early in the night the dance floor isn’t crowded and this would ensure that they could safely bang the beat without beating locals. From there the possibilities would be limitless.
Most likely Pauly D and “The Situation” would creep after some girls heading into The Tin and Lint, especially because the crowd there skews younger like these ageless wonders like it. From there they would lead a parade back to their rented house on Union Ave., but would get sidetracked in Congress Park after trying to catch a live duck they mistake for a relative of their phone from their Jersey Shore house.
Ronnie and Sammi would definitely bail on the group early in the night after devouring cheese fries from Hot Dog Charlie’s and verbally antagonizing each other after one of them compares the other to a horse. There is also the possibility that Ronnie would be inclined to fight hipsters from The Putnam Dead or tourist guidos at The City Tavern.

Vinny would chase an older woman into Desperate Annie’s, and he would end up staying the night with her. In the morning she would cook him breakfast and then adopt him, thus fulfilling his definitive sexual fantasy.
“Snookie” and “J-Woww” would set up camp on the fourth floor of The City Tavern, where they would command the dance floor before being arrested for violating decency standards that exist everywhere in the world besides Caligula’s Rome and the Jersey Shore.
This night doesn’t even represent the true potential of the cast, as this theoretical whirlwind would be tantamount to their weeknight endeavors. I can’t imagine what this group could do on Caroline Street during Travers, but I can only theorize that it would be a situation.

Monday, January 25, 2010

4 Hours In

I'm four hours into the eighth day of 24 and I'm not really impressed. In fact, I'd go so far as to this season has just been bad.
The highlight in this season, and biggest surprise, has been the performance of Freddie Prinze Jr. Playing the straight arrow Agent Cole Ortiz, Prinze was responsible for the only exciting and rewarding moment in the season when he prevented the death of the generic Middle East leader. His character seems vaguely familiar to the by the book Renee Walker from last season, who eventually evolved (or devolved) into a mini-Jack Bauer. I hope he doesn't embrace the same grey area that she readily embraced last year and lost her identity. I like Prinze as a foil to Bauer, especially since it could lead to a confrontation down the road.
Speaking of Renee Walker, i think her return has been very unsatisfying. (Spoiler alert) Her unveiling as an extreme version of Bauer, in that she won't think twice about cutting off a guy's hand, seemed very phony. I don't care what back story they provide to explain her transition, it will not be satisfying.
My biggest let down so far has been Katee Sackhoff, who I expected, nay demanded, big things from. This is an actress who kills it in every chance she gets to shine, granted playing the same person basically, but she seems like she's going to be inappropriately used if they continue this mysterious story that is neither mysterious or a good story. I hate these tangents they embark on every season of 24 when there's some idiotic and pointless arc that involves some CTU agents private life, with the worst being the CTU Chief's problems with her daughter one season. UGH. But back to Sackhoff, who was even good in the atrocious BIONIC WOMAN, where she played an awesome villain.
Ideally I'd like Sackhoff to get a gun and get to work, either as a bad guy or a good guy.
Anyway, I still hate Cherry Jones as the worst president ever. Chloe is still great. And once again, all of CTU's problems could be avoided if everyone just listened to Jack.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Business Consultant

(Editor’s Note: A version of this article may appear in THE SCENE. This article may not be appropriate for young children or readers that don’t like strained analogies)

In the last week I’ve discovered the infectious tune “Mr. Businessman” by Ray Stevens, and worn away the song’s metaphorical record grooves.

Constant playing has ingrained the lyrics into my consciousness and I began to ponder their meaning as a result. While not normally the type of person who would try to analyze words in a pop song, it felt like Ray was speaking to me and I had to digest his message.

Avoiding the obvious, since 99 cents on iTunes had earned me the right to be delusional, I latched onto the idea that references to “taking care of business” were an allusion to sex. I then concluded that Ray had made an inspirational piece aimed at rallying men to become thriving businessmen (if you catch my drift).

Ultimately the song fails to deliver any clear solution for success the way the Beatles did in their prescription for happiness, which was a warm gun.

Contemplating the flaws in my personal business model I again moved beyond the obvious, such as my doughy physique, fringe personality, abnormal facial growth masquerading as a beard and penchant for dressing like the homeless, and seized upon a rationale less upsetting to my ego. Living with my parents is bad for business and drives away consumers.

With an inhospitable work environment out there, I can’t be the only one whose lack of green has turned them blue as they reside at home, so with the help of arbitrarily chosen music lyrics I’ve found these tips for working out of your parents’ house…

“I want to walk you home. Please let me walk you home (Fats Domino).” – Fun fact, Fats dreamed up this idea in conjunction with the decision that his pizza place should deliver. This option has become a mainstay in every businessman’s repertoire, although in this case the walk of shame only comes after closing a deal.

“I wanna make love in this club, yeah (USHER)” – You wouldn’t entertain a client in your break room, yeah, but just remember that you’re in public and things need to remain somewhat professional, yeah.

“We were out on a date in my daddy's car (Wayne Cochran)”- Because carpooling isn’t just efficient, it’s a throwback to America’s industrial heyday in the 1950s when business was booming. Relive the good old days when every girl knew how to work a stick shift and tops always came down.

“There’s something good, waiting down this road (Tom Petty)” – Business trips are fun, especially if you take the Willy Loman approach.

“Sky rockets in flight. Afternoon delight (Starland Vocal Band)” – Ideally your company motto should be “when it’s right, it’s right,” but when you’re forced to work from home it is an imperative to finish your business before the nightshift arrives.

“Well I wait so long for my love vibration and I’m dancing with myself (Billy Idol)” – There’s nothing wrong with going into business for yourself, as it allows you to work on your own schedule and enables you to bide your time while you entertain other offers.

“I’ve got to run away. I’ve got to get away (Soft Cell)” – All of these measures aren’t permanent solutions, so ultimately you need to move out for real growth and long-term relationships.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

White Collar is stiff as ever!

White Collar is back and while not better than ever, it's at least not worse! I've settled into a nice zone with this show where I don't expect much and have my expectations met each week.
We left the show on a cliffhanger of sorts that could have been really interesting if USA put on shows that were really interesting. Instead everyone is friends, we all wear fancy shirts and there are some gratuitous attempts at conveying a lavish lifestyle that fall devastatingly short.
(Spoiler Alert) There was a chance that the agent guy, whose name currently escapes me, might have been a bad guy, but that isn't the case. Crazy twist, right? WRONG! The twist would have been provocative television, but instead we get the same buddy dramedy we always get on USA. Oh it could have been good...We could have had some Lost type stuff here, with Neil investigating his supposed friend and then we get some back story later on that explains stuff or something. Anything like that would have been amazing, but USA doesn't do serial dramas. They do episodic crap that they can churn out in the vein of a GM plant.
I'm so mad!!!!!
Maybe I'm expecting too much from a television show, when i want it to be the THOMAS CROWN AFFAIR. But this is supposedly the golden era of television when people swing for the fences. This feels like a sacrifice bunt or whatever the equivalent safe move is.
My overwhelming problem with White Collar is that I don't believe the world it creates. Not for a minute to I buy this world or the characters that inhabit it. Maybe you can say it is escapism, but this setup is a lame fantasy.
I want to embrace this show because there is a bit of mystery. The idea of CATCH ME IF YOU CAN as a tv show is cool, and its made better with this hidden conflict. This could be a good show on FX, except it is just a happy go lucky romp on USA. Whatever.

Monday, January 18, 2010

I CAN POST VIDEO!!!

It had come to my attention that i have the ability to post video. While I am still editing the solo porno i filmed in the mirror, I will try to post something else while we're all waiting.
This would be super exciting, except I think I can only post video i have. That means i need to practice ripping stuff off the internet. Although, I do have the capability to steal bits of dvds....
I've already got tons of West Wing clips. Maybe i should make a regular thing of posting my favorites. I'll assume that no responses to this post means I should post West Wing clips. Yeah! You guys are the best! Except you, the person thinking about commenting. Wouldn't waste you time, though, because i could just delete it. Did that just blow your mind?
Well to have your mind completely blown, imagine watching West Wing clips!! It all comes full circle, and you guessed it, blows my mind!

Ray Stevens is TCB


Through the magic of XM radio i learned of a new favorite song. It's by Ray Stevens and is called "Mr. Businessman."
Stevens originally made his mark as a comedy singer in the vein of Flight of the Conchords, but in 1968 he branched out with this serious hit. According to wikipedia it was a country sensation, reaching #1 on some chart, which i assume is kept on the side of a barn at Willie Nelson's house.
The song absolutely rocks. Youtube only offers the music, and here it is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Z3ad7V30ZU

Weeds Season 5 on DVD

On Tuesday the 5th season of Weeds becomes available on DVD or Blue Ray. In anticipation for this big day I've been watching the season illegally online, so that I could give you rapid fans sound advice.
In keeping with my high standards, I haven't actually seen the whole season. I'm 7 episodes into the 13 episode season and feel confident I can provide an adequate gist of the show and its merit this season.
Season 5 begins in the wake of Nancy (Mary Louise Parker) revealing to her BF/Drug King Pin/Mexican Mayor that she is pregnant with his child. The move is an attempt to stave off death after it becomes clear he knows she ratted on his smuggling operation.
All of this isn't that big of a deal, though, and seems contained solely to Nancy's universe (well little Shane gets a fun sidekick for a while). But the other story lines include Silas continuing to strike out on his own, Doug finding more people to latch on to, Celia annoying her way out of a kidnapping and Andy (banging only two women so far) sort of just keeping himself available as Nancy's sidekick.
For some reason the stakes of this season don't seem as high as other seasons. Typically Nancy is a hair away from seeing her life collapse around her, but now she seems to be in a room without any corners to paint herself into. As a result, I don't find the show very compelling or the dynamic understandable.
That's not to say the show isn't as funny as ever, because it is. Additionally, I find myself not hating Shane, which is a first, and even Silas is growing on me. Doug is still classic Doug, and has his best moments when he is inspired by the life of George Hamilton, who he strives to emulate. As for Andy, I could just listen to his take on life for hours on end.
Justin Kirk as Andy Botwin has found the role of his life. At this point the show could kill off Nancy and let the crew of Andy, Doug, Silas, Shane and the two Hodes that like women start their own show. I would watch it, and it seems like the Botwin boys could move on without their mom, since early in the year they responded to the possibility of her death by vying for her bedroom.
Unfortunately the tenor of the show is off this season, and i'm worried it won't be able to make up for this in the last six episodes. Part of this problem is a product of the show's jumping of the shark when they moved the family. That destroyed the best part of the show, which was the atmosphere in which everything was taking place. They tried to recreate that feel, but ultimately it feels phony and unrewarding.
Weeds is a different show now, from what it originally was, and not just because of the disappearance of Conrad. This show isn't bad, but it's not great. I will still enjoy finishing this season, and I'd recommend you buy it/rent it if you're already a fan, but I'd argue that there are too many weeds in this crop of Weeds.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

The GOLDEN GLOBES: RUNNING DIARY


(Running Diary of the GLobes)
Ricky opened with plenty of penis jokes and the requisite Jay leno joke: “Let’s get on with it before NBC replaces me with Jay Leno." Glad he ripped on Keifer and his OFFICE protege.
Nicole Kidman’s dress looks like a night gown.
Vera Farmiga looks like a Twilight vampire. Speaking of which, so does Anna Kendrick….
Boo! Monique won. Definitely needs more material for that dress. I want to revel in her experience, but I find myself being only annoyed. (O for 1)
Jennifer Garner definitely had stuff done to her lips. They look so fake. I’m not saying I don’t like them. .
I wonder who Lea Michelle (Glee) is at the awards with
Toni Collette won Best Actress (0 for 2). Toni does a great British accent. I wonder if she’s getting ready for some bio piece, so that she needs to practice this voice.I think Madonna could help her hone it a little bit.
Boy, Lauren Graham is stunning. Jim Parsons is kind of hot too.
•Jeremy Piven looks exactly like my friend Brett Strom
•Lithgow wins (1 for 3). Guess I need to catch up on Dexter soon.
So UP was the obvious winner here. Nothing really to say except that I hope it gets nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars.
Great nod to history, as Ricky remarks on how the Golden Globes used to be for sale.
So Felicity Huffman either can’t read or she is drunk. My guess is both.
Michael Hall wins best actor in a tv Drama (1 for 4). I don’t want to say that this is a pity joke, but it sort of is (he has cancer).
So Elliot Spitzer’s wife won best actress in TV Drama (1 for 5). Quality shot at NBC, as she cites CBS’s faith in the “ten o’clock drama.”
Harrison Ford looks so pissed. Maybe another earring would help him loosen up.
Ricky took a shot at Sir Paul’s divorce. Excellent.
Who is the transvestite Christina Aguilera is sharing the stage with????
Amy Adams looks terrible, like she just got out of bed. I honestly think I despise her.
So it would appear that Drew Barrymore is back together with Justin Long. I like that, because there’s a chance they both could die in the same accident that way.
Only at the Golden Globes does Duplicity get an award nomination.
Meryl Streep wins for Julie and Julia (2 for 6). She is so charming. There is nothing she can’t do, except humility.
No one is paying attention to Helen Mirren. I enjoy that.
Sam Worthington=Russell Crow 2.0
Kevin Bacon is asking people about the cash prize and where he can invest it.
You heard that right, there’s going to be a fourth Shrek movie.
So Jason Reitman won best screenplay (2 for 7), which makes me rethink my Best Picture Drama pick. Too bad I can’t change it now, but if I could I would.
I wish Tracy Morgan would have accepted for Alec Baldwin (3 for 8)
In the immortal words of Tony Kornheiser, “Sophie Lauren is still getting it done.”
(4 for 9) Mad Men wins Best Drama. Suck it Serial killers, vampires and doctors. The cast of Mad Men look nothing like the people they play. That’s acting!
(4 for 10) No love for Jane Lynch as Big Love’s Chloe Something (that’s how it is pronounced) steal’s the award. Her dress getting ripped was karma.
(5 for 11) Everyone’s favorite Nazi, other than Sergeant Shultz, wins!
Leo Dicaprio and Bob DeNiro, also known as Muse #2 and Muse #1 for Martin Scorsese. I like that DeNiro can be funny when not playing a mobster or Ben Stiller’s father-in-law.
Ricky Gervais should host everything. Great dig at Mel Gibson, who probably shouldn’t be referencing a movie about Jews in the wake of his murky past with these people.
The Director of Aquaman won best director! (6 for 12)
Guess I should have betted against Glee. (6 for 13). Not happy that it won, since it has only been on the air for half a season. But boy, the women on this show are so hot!
I would have watched THE HANGOVER with Mike Tyson playing the Zak Galifianakis role. So I picked (500) Days of Summer to win best Comedy/Musical, (6 for 14) but I’m happy The Hangover won. Didn’t think they had a chance coming into this, since it seems odd that they would acknowledge this ridiculous movie.
It would be easy to make Golden Globe jokes about all the big globes on display (Joan from Mad Men), but I’m glad I waited for something more substantial. Well, my reward was the golden face of Mickey Rourke, who apparently turned himself golden for the performance and brought a golden statue woman with him.
Mickey Rourke seems less pleased than Harrison Ford to be presenting. I’m angrier than both now that Sandra Bullock won a Golden Globe (6 for 15). I’m livid that she won. Never actually saw THE BLIND SIDE, but I watched those trailers and didn’t need to see “Remember the Titans 3: Desperate Housewives Endeavor.”
Another travesty (6 for 16) with Downey Jr winning. Glad he gets to make a speech, though, since he is hilarious. I just wish he would hand off that award to someone more deserving.
Overplayed the bias of the Foreign Press (6 for 17) as Jeff Bridges wins Best Actor.
I picked INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS, but I’m totally regretting it now. I think Up in the Air is going to win, and I would change if I could. Apparently, though, it didn’t matter, since Avatar won. Maybe I’ll have to see it now (6 for 18).

Golden Globe: TV predictions

Here are the rest of my Globe predictions, which are all from the small screen (that's your television screen).
Best Show Drama: Mad Men
-Where is the nomination for Lost?!??! REally, House get's nominated, but not Lost. Shame. Didn't see this season of Dexter, which was well received. There is nothing currently on television on par with Mad Men, so it should win.
Best Show Comedy/Musical:30 Rock
-I'm not betting against 30 Rock. Glee, it should be noted, fits all three categories. Oh yeah, and Entourage has no business being nominated for anything.
Best Actor Drama:Jon Hamm
-His character carried the show during a turbulent season.
Best Actress Drama: January Jones
-She is so hot.
Best Actor Comedy/Musical:Alec Baldwin
Best Actress Comedy/Musical: Edie Falco
-Never seen the show, but i think she might have the chops to beat Tina Fey. These people loved Carmela Soprano.
Best Supporting Actor: Michael Emerson
-Ok, that's from the heart (my head says Jon Lithgow)
Best Supporting Actress: Jane Lynch
-She is the star of Glee

Golden Globes Coming Soon!

Tonight i'll be doing a running diary for the Golden Globes. Look for it to go up about an hour or two after the awards are over.
Here are my movie predictions ahead of time with brief rationales. Television picks are coming.
Best Picture Drama: Inglourious Basterds
-The story of Avatar might not resonate with the foreign press, and they're not going to endorse Americans playing Cowboy in Hurt Locker. Precious relies more on a couple really good performances. Comes down to UP in the Air and Basterds, with Basterds winning out through Tarantino appeal.
Best Picture Comedy/Musical: (500) Days of Summer
-I want this one to win.
Best Actor Drama: Colin Firth
-He's British. Jeff Bridges has a chance
Best Actress Drama: Care Mulligan
-Foreign movie
Best Actor Comedy: Michael Stuhlbarg
-He was great in A Serious Man.
Best Actress Comedy: Meryl Streep
-She wins for Julie and Julia
Supporting Actor: Christopher Waltz
Supporting Actress: Vera Farmiga
Best Director: James Cameron
-Too revolutionary not to win
Best Screenplay: District 9
-I'm biased (Basterds probably will win)

SNL: I call it quits after Update

So based on the title of this post, my review of this week's SNL will not cover the entirety of the night. This may or may not be a good thing, since often the show becomes a vast wasteland of crap after update, but last week with Sir Charles there were some good moments after the fake news.
Anyway, i found tonight's episode to be fair. It was middle of the road, maintaining a balance that kept me smiling, but never made me really laugh or really made me mad.
Here are my thoughts, in order:
1. The cold open was wildly erratic. Fred Armisen was great as Larry King, but Bill Hader was useless as Conan. He should have done some hair movements or something. For a guy who prides himself on his impersonations, this one was weak. The best part of the sketch was Larry King spelling out a website's URL and Jason Sudekis silently capturing David Letterman.
2. THe monologue was boring. I should have realized this would be indicative of the night, where Sigourney fails to captivate.

3. Keenan Thompson is great. He plays an old guy better than most old guys. Sigourney tried to ruin the skit, but it is saved when the two share the scene to act out strange sex acts. Ultimately, the highlight is watching Keenan in his oversized boxers and dress socks. It doesn't matter what he says or does, since that visual is amazing.
4. Hated the disco sketch. I wonder if someone besides Kristen Wigg could have done a better job. WE'll never know, since she apparently has to be in every sketch. Speaking of which....
5. Would have liked a break from Wigg in the ESPN classic sketch. She didn't bring anything that one of the featured girls couldn't have brought. The focus of this skit is Sudekis and Forte, who have perfected these characters that I love.
6. The Ting Tings are great. That song is eh, but the way they perform it is great. Really exciting, like a toned down version of Lady Gaga. Actually, it would be more appropriate to say a heavily sedated version if she was forced to adhere to some sort of dress code. Still pretty cool.
7. Digital short was cool, if only to see James Cameron letting loose like he did on Entourage. The pop culture references were fun, although my enjoyment usually comes down to how much time Lorne Michaels gets in these skits, which was plenty this time and made it good.
8. Update sucked. The Meryl Streep impersonation was good and the critique was correct, but it wasn't worth a whole bit. Loved Larry the Goose. The rest of Update was just, eh. So i guess it didn't suck.

What did you think? Did you watch it? Did you think Leno was taking over SNL?

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Jersey Shore: Roid Rage Ronnie

A lot happened on Thursday's episode of Jersey Shore, which was a two-parter that included a trip to Atlantic City. The two hours were superb television and left me wanting more.
What I want to talk about, though, is the last few minutes of the event and the actions of Ronnie.
Last week i condemned Ronnie's actions and the coverage of MTV. This week I've got nothing new to say about all of this, except that I'm glad Ronnie got arrested for his unprovoked attack. YOU CAN'T JUST HIT PEOPLE!!!
I'm glad MTV showed the consequences of his actions, and I hope that they don't gloss over the event in the next issue. I don't care about them promoting drinking or sexual promiscuity, as I endorse both life choices, but i don't condone the violent rampages of this cast. These people have problems, from JWOWW to Ronnie, everyone seems poised to snap at any moment.
I'm still not sure about MTV's responsibility in all of this, in terms of how they cover it and how they promote the show. The only thing i'm certain of is that they shouldn't shy away from the consequences. We get to hear and see people throw up from drinking, so we shouldn't avoid the consequences of violent actions.
I know i sound like a parent or at least a square (people say that, right?), but this really bothered me. It was particularly troubling after I watched a scuffle between high school students after a basketball game, when one fan punched out a fan from an opposing school. He probably isn't taking his cues from Ronnie, but it's all indicative of a culture that lacks good judgment or foresight.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Life's Krispy Kreme Challenges

(Editor's Note: A version of this column will appear in THE SCENE on Friday. But as devoted followers we thought we'd give you a taste first, before someone actually edits Dave's work)

On February 6 I’ll be in North Carolina for the Krispy Kreme challenge. The challenge requires you to run two miles, then stuff your face with 12 Krispy Kremes and then run two more miles. There is an optional break to throw up, but that’s left up to the 5,500 participants who turn out to support the North Carolina Children’s Hospital.

You’re right to assume this is a daunting task. Last year I finished with a time just under an hour and struggled with both aspects of the challenge. This year I’m training to ensure a better time.

I’ve begun running almost every day and now feel confident about the running portion, even while carrying a load of doughnuts and regret for the last two miles.



The real issue is avoiding the near meltdown of last year when I almost couldn’t finish the doughnuts. That is why I wanted to practice eating Krispy Kremes, but the nearest store is a prohibitively far 140 miles away. So instead I’ll substitute a sweet treat for training purposes (and my slow suicide), because that would be a ridiculous trip in pursuit of a ridiculously trivial challenge.

Although part of the fun in life is making a big deal about the inconsequential. Like how getting geared up for menial battles helps provide meaning in what can seem like an otherwise repetitive and meaningless day.

To this end I’ve detailed some of the obstacles people deal with on a daily basis, which can be inflated to epic proportions.

The “Snooze” Speculation: Every morning you get to be a scientist like Einstein, as you test the relativity of time. Will five extra minutes of sleep make your morning routine more efficient or will the lost time mean losing breakfast? This debate may be moot, since with the snooze button five minutes often escalates into twenty minutes, which is when you get to challenge Einstein’s theories about the speed of light on the Northway. Speaking of which….

Speed Racer: Real Life: In truth we’re all NASCAR fans, it’s just that most of us would rather be driving the cars and not associating with hillbillies. Not only does one get the adrenaline of a high pressure race, commuters get to flaunt the law by blatantly disregarding speed limits.

Lane Change Crisis: While not on par with the Cuban Missile Crisis, this battle of bumpers also comes down to a matter of who will blink first. One car represents the blockade around Cuba, which is cool because you get to play JFK, and the other car embodies a ship from the USSR, which is also appealing since you get to behave like an unwieldy Khrushchev. Ultimately the threat of mutually rising insurance costs keeps everyone acting reasonable.

Caffeine Conundrum: Sure our white collar forbearers got by on eight cups of coffee and a stiff afternoon drink, but today’s miracle science gives us the option of artificially enhancing our performance capabilities. Whether to utilize Red Bull or 5 Hour Energy represent the greatest moral quandary of our day. Especially since we need to rethink things like overtime pay, since we now waste so much time peeing and our hearts are already beating overtime so OT doesn’t have the same meaning.

These four events represent a small fraction of the daily occurrences that let people escape into a world of adventure and intrigue. For more on this topic read my upcoming book, “LOOK AT ME I’M FLYING,” which details the life of a man riding an airplane.

Late Night Laughs

Don't let the title of this post fool you, it's not about the fledgling LATE NIGHT and its host Jimmy Fallon. I'm more interested with the other late night hosts and how they've handled the ambiguity surrounding the future of NBC's late night lineup.
The best joke I've heard is from Craig Feguson. I don't have a link for it or remember the actual joke, but I'll paraphrase it for you...


Craig: With all the turmoil surrounding late night television, organizations like TMZ have begun following us hosts around. 'Jay, will you be moving to 11:30?' 'Conan are you taking over at Fox?' 'Craig, what are you doing with a transvestite hooker in your car?'

Hilarious, right? I don't really care for Craig's show, even though i think it is funny. My problem stems from the style of the show, which is akin to hanging out with a guy that's funny. Some people find that appealing, but I like the skits and remotes on Conan's show. My brother is a devoted follower of Craig, so take that how you will.

Some critics I listen to from SLATE magazine assert that Jay has shined amidst this controversy, which I reject. He just seems smug to me and is doing the same boring approach. "Hey, Kevin, did you see this? I'm a prick." Ok, so maybe i made that up.

Letterman must be relishing his spot at CBS right now. My belief stems from the joy on his face as he attacks NBC executives, who 17 years ago opted not to give him the TONIGHT SHOW gig.

As for Conan, he appears to be in a tricky position for now. He doesn't want to lash out, but at the same time he must want someone's blood. His attitude can be seen in his recent interview with Ricky Gervais, during which Ricky went on the attack against NBC and Conan played the role of reluctant objector. He does take legitimate shots, though, which are hilarious.

This dynamic is great for material and ratings in the short run. Although, I can't imagine Conan continuing to do his show much longer until the future of THE TONIGHT SHOW is resolved. It must be so draining to go out there and do this right now. I feel for him, especially since he moved across the country for this opportunity.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Fringe Goof

The show Fringe aired an episode on Tuesday, which isn't its normal night, that was advertised as a new episode. Fine and dandy. I love extra episodes of Fringe. The problem here is that the episode had the presence of a dead character on the show...
It would appear that this was just a filler episode that never aired and was just thrown on, regardless of the continuity problems. I'm inclined to believe that since the dead character was only one for 8 seconds and the episode doesn't address any of the show's larger story arc.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Spiderman 4

So Spiderman 4 is heading a radical direction (supposedly). Director Sam Raimi and star Tobey Maguire bailed on the movie, driving the overhaul of the franchise.
Apparently the new direction will mimic other reboots, specifically the Batman franchise under Christopher Nolan, which means darker stuff.
I have two problems with this idea.
1. This grittier choice has become a cliche. Bond, Batman and even The Hulk are examples of source materials that benefited from a more serious change, but not every redo is done as well. In an attempt to become up the "grit" quotient there is a chance that the product just becomes moodier, and that's a failure. For instance, THE WATCHMEN (which i love) was totally dark, but it was a commercial and critical failure.
In this case there are claims that Spiderman will explore contemporary issues, whatever that means. UGHHH! This stuff drives me crazy. Mostly because...
2. SPIDERMAN is a dark enough character. The guy has plenty of demons and they've been adequately explored already. Why ruin a good thing? It's not like Spiderman has had its Batman and Robin moment yet.

I hated Spiderman 3, but i still wouldn't have changed anything. The second movie was simply great and the franchise had definitely found its star in Tobey Maguire. Rocking the boat was not only pointless, I think it will end up costing them money.

Monday, January 11, 2010

Chuck versus the 3rd Season Makeover!

The long and short of it is that NBC's Chuck basically stinks now. It's not funny, which was the show's saving grace. The music is still great. The action is still respectable for tv. The female lead is still super hot. It's too bad that one fatal flaw, the lack of comedy could submarine this complex show. But it does.
Maybe I'm selling the show short, since I'm writing off two quality seasons after 1.5 episodes of season three... That's my prerogative, though, as dictator of this blog, to make rash decisions on a whim.
Oh yeah, Chuck also seems to be playing up the most annoying aspect of the show, which is the relationship between Chuck and his female CIA handler (whose name I have momentarily forgotten). They split this unlikely pair up b making Chuck behave in a very unlikely and rather unbelievable manner. It's annoying.
Hopefully once the show takes care of establishing the new direction it's heading it will find its footing again and reestablish its roots. All the elements of a good show are present, it's just the current recipe is unsatisfying since it doesn't utilize all the ingredients and overuses other ones.
I'll keep watching. Will u?

Sunday, January 10, 2010

The Future of NBC

So Jay Leno is being pulled from his time slot at ten and appears to be taking over for half an hour after the news. The change will probably push Conan back half an hour and puts the show directly against Jimmy Kimmel Live.
This new dynamic creates a glaring hole in NBC's lineup every night at ten. Luckily for them, I have a solution!
Obviously they can't green light new programing fast enough to fill the void, but my proposed setup will incorporate two new shows NBC was already planning on debuting. One is a reality program called the Marriage Ref and the other one is an hour dramedy called Parenthood. The lineup i created incorporates these shows and some other properties NBC owns. It all starts after the Olympics. Here we go...
MONDAY
8:CHUCK; 9:Heroes; 10:Caprica
The first two shows are in their normal time slots, but CAPRICA might seem new to you. It is a show that will be debuting on SYFY in January, but would fit right in with this lineup. They all appeal to the same demographic. Caprica would do better in this time slot than Leno, since it would probably hold the audience of Heroes better than Jay did. And if NBC thought Leno was cheap, they'll find that reruns are even cheaper, which is nice.
This set of shows would help cement NBC's niche as the geek channel. This is a very appealing audience to networks, as geeks are usually part of the 18-49 demographic. That means money.

TUESDAY
8: The Biggest Loser; 9: Royal Pains; 10: Trauma

I would like to move The Biggest Loser to Friday, where reality tv belongs but I think it is too good of a lead to waste. So I won't waste it, and i'll use it to attract viewers to Royal Pains. Pains is a dramedy on USA about a doctor in the Hamptons. The show has broad appeal and I think they could rerun episodes from season 1 that would retain viewers from THe Biggest Loser. Also, it would be a good way to generate buzz for the second season or possibly introduce it as a regular show in the fall.
As for Trauma, there are 6 episodes already filmed and NBC can run them before it finally gets the ax. No reason to waste the episodes. THere's also a bit of a health theme that Trauma could continue.

Wednesday
8: Mercy; 9: Law & Order: SVU; 10: Friday Night Lights
I've never seen MERCY and only know that it's about a strong female nurse who takes the world head on. Excuse me while i go vomit from that gag worthy description. Keeping with that theme, we'll follow MERCY with Mariska Hartigay. NBC already tried to promote this idea that Wednesday is all about female empowerment, so we'll run with that plan. SVU probably should be at 10 because of its content, but I don't really care and FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS is also very adult.
Speaking of LIGHTS, this show is supposed to be back on Fridays. I reject the idea that LIGHTS should air on Friday, when it is essentially lost to nowhere. This is supposedly the best drama NBC has (never actually seen it), so it deserves a chance to garner a real audience.

Thursday
8: Community/Parks and Recreations; 9:The Office/30 Rock; 10: Parenthood
Thursday is comedy night in my vision. The first two hours remain the same, and instead of inserting some drama in this traditionally dramatic slot i'm keeping the comedy theme alive.
Parenthood is a new show from Brian Grazer and Ron Howard, starring Gilmore Girls alum Lauren Graham. Their best bet for success is utilizing the strength of its lead, which should be maximized by the power of Graham.

Friday (THROWAWAY DAY)
8: Marriage Ref; 9: Law & Order; 10:Dateline
I don't know anything about Marriage Ref except that it's a reality show, which means it should be on Friday. Why? Because reality tv usually sucks, and prime real estate shouldn't we wasted on the sucky (I think Moses said that).
As for the other two shows, well, like i said, Friday is for tv that sucks.

What about Saturday and Sunday? Well there is no original content on these days anymore.

You're Better Off WITH Ted

Do you ever find yourself yearning for something to do at 2 in the morning? You've tried reading, but you're not literate. You've tried listening to music, but it makes you get up and dance. You got a cookie, but now you're engaged in an endless pursuit as if you were a mouse (everyone knows that reference, right?)
Well if you're like me, and I'm sorry if you, you will eventually seek refuge in your computer. And while that may mean the erotic offerings it can provide you with, in this case I'm talking about online TV. After scanning the latest offerings on HULU I recently discovered a show I had a brief affair with, and discovered we still had chemistry.
The show I rediscovered, and recommend for you, is the ABC comedy, BETTER OFF TED. It details corporate life in a large faceless company, basically making jokes about all the things that are depressing in real life.
Our protagonist Ted, is played by Jay Harrington, who you may recognize from a plethora of guest arcs and failed pilots (The American version of COUPLING). He looks and acts perfect for this part, as the clean cut suit who constantly defends the little guy against the higher ups, specifically Portia De Rossi's character, Veronica. Their battles are routine, consisting of lively banter that is the trademark of the show.
Ted also spars with Linda (Andrea Anders), who represents his potential love interest in a will they/won't they dynamic that doesn't drive me absolutely crazy. Actually they might have hooked up already, but i missed most of season one and two episodes from season two.
Anyway, the show is funny if you don't mind zany comedy. It's essentially a more traditional version of 30 Rock, in that it its all a series of running jokes, but it is more like Scrubs with all of its lessons and narration.
Much of the humor stems from the constant twists and turns of the show, which keep the experience fresh and engaging. This is not the stale comedy of TWO AND A HALF MEN or the nonsense of SCRUBS. The writing is relatively tight, with few arcs wasted on humorless endeavors.
I think I like the show because it is fun, creative and sexy. Oh yeah, everyone on this show is ridiculously hot. I don't know what the company makes, but they would definitely make great babies.
So if you're up late at night and need something to waste time with, I think you wouldn't go wrong with looking up BETTER OFF TED on HULU.

Seriously Man, Chill

A SERIOUS MAN is a good movie. Good, but not great. Michael Stuhlbarg is great as Larry Gopnik, our beleaguered hero.
Gopnik is a physics professor in 1967 and he is Jewish. The latter label is prominent in his identity, much more so than his job, at least in terms of the story presented. His identity as a Jew is important in terms of how he views the world and how he addresses the challenge of that world. The most obvious consequence of his judaism is the fact that he turns to the Synagogue for answers.
I guess some people could view this as a man just turning to his faith, and that any religion would have been interchangeable, but I'd argue that the Synagogue offers different answers and raises different questions. What these may be, I don't really know...
(Editor's Note: Dave Lombardo doesn't know anything about religion. He thinks he does, but he is stupid, so he never really is aware of what he actually knows. Don't let him offend you. You don't get offended by the actions of a dumb ant, do you? Well Dave Lombardo is an ant in your life. Maybe not ignore him, but don't be surprised if he gets annoying.)
The most visible aspect of Judaism in the movie is the bar mitzvah of Larry's younger child. This event is included more in terms of the son's story line, who is played convincingly enough by Aaron Wolff, but for Larry it represents a cornerstone in his role as a father. It is just one of his responsibilities as a parent, specifically a Jewish parents, to see their child past this point.
Anyway, let me talk about the movie in sentences I actually understand. This movie is distinctly a product of the Coen brothers. Ok, I don't truly know what that means or how to articulate it, but once you've seen at least four of their pictures you'll get it.
In this case, the spiraling chaos of the movie is a characteristic of the Coen brothers. (spoiler alert) I say spiraling chaos, because it works as a good pun considering the town seems doomed to destruction by a tornado in the closing moments of the movie.
I really liked the world the Coen brothers created. It seemed realistic enough, except for the zany characters that occupied it. I'm inclined to believe that the people are how the Coen brothers saw this world when they experienced it as kids, which explains their skewed perception. They're looking back through the foggy lens of time and the fact they couldn't have processed everything adequately.
(Editor's Note: We're not sure where he drew those conclusions from. Dave probably heard someone smarter than him say something like that. We will be hunting down the possible sources he plagiarized so we'll have grounds to remove him and his worthless blog. Until then, be on the lookout for ideas that seem like they might be from NPR. That means liberal, whiny, introspective, lame, wordy, uber-liberal and begin with "This is Terri Gross from NPR.")
So why did I like this movie? Probably because it was funny, in a really depressing way. This is called dark humor or something equally contradictory, although at this point it should just be called Coen Humor.
The story captivates us because we follow a desperate man driven to the end of his rope by the people around him. His obstacles aren't exactly life or death, but with the way they're framed and revealed it feels like a thriller. That's a slight exaggeration. It is fair to say that you will get caught up in the world of Larry Gopnik, as it appears to be closing down on him. It's like when you know a car wreck is about to happen, and you can't look away.

Saturday, January 9, 2010

The Lumbys: The Idea

Get your tuxedos ready because my movie awards are fat approaching....
The awards for my blog will be called the Lumbys. They will be given only for movies. The categories will include:
Best Picture
Best Actor/Actress
Best Supporting Actor/Actress
Best Movie I didn't See
Best Original/Adapted Screenplay
Worst Movie
Hottest Girl/Hottest Guy
Breakout Performance
Best Villain/Best Hero

Anyone else got one? Thoughts on these?

Murkey Area on the Boardwalk

The idea of THE JERSEY SHORE is not offensive to me. I have had no problem with the show until the most recent episode, which in my opinion showcased violence in a spectacular manner that was out of line. I think that it was inappropriate because it was only two episodes after the show refused to show a woman getting hit and then aired a PSA about violence against women.
That's great, if you want to go that way. But you can't do that and then air two drunk fights in one episode, as if they're just good fun because the genders stuck to their own teams.
In the most recent episode Ronnie got into a scuffle on the Boardwalk and Snookie exchanged claw swipes at the house with "two hippos."

Regarding the former I think the show aired something that was much more violent than when Snookie got dropped. It also showed Ronnie getting into this fight without any repercussions. He didn't start the fight, but he engaged in it and savagely beat another person. While MTV let us know how serious it was with menacing background music, they probably were hypocritical to not block it our or air another PSA.
Also, I think the security on the show has a job to prevent these fights. THere is no reason why they couldn't have stepped in and prevented this. Frankly, I think the person who was beaten has a lawsuit against MTV, on the basis that they encouraged Ronnie to drink, are aware of his violent predisposition and never stepped in. PAULY D could tell this guy was trouble, so there should be some level of culpability for the producers of the show.
Regarding Snookie's incident with two large trespassers, I think security again failed and allowed a preventable occurrence to happen. This isn't the REAL WORLD, it's the JERSEY SHORE, so i don't think people care to see what happened when people start getting real. We want to see them battle the beat and not other people.
Don't get me wrong, though, because I still love this show. I think it is hilarious. But if the show rubs me the wrong way they must be doing something wrong, because while moral compass is rooted in stone, it also needs to get pushed very far before it calls for a change of direction.

An exhausting Day As An Underemployed Colelge Grad

(Editor's Note: A version of this column appeared in THE SARATOGIAN)

As a part-time employee it’s hard for my body to get used to the idea of a 9 to 5 schedule. The infrequent work allows me to hang onto the delusion that I’m still a college student, and has encouraged me to embrace that lifestyle. This is evident in my insistence on having a winter break, the fact I deem Wednesday acceptable for drinking and the constant battles with my RAs, Jim and Barb (dad and mom, respectively).


To be fair, with some Red Bull and hot chocolate I can get ready for the occasional days when I drive down to Albany and provide accounts on legislative public hearings for an organization called Statewatch. Also, I’m sure that if this gig became full-time my body would embrace the new schedule in just a couple of days. The problem is that on most days I don’t have any reason to get up and therefore I don’t feel the need to abandon my night owl ways.


From my parents’ point of view this means I’m being unproductive. I think they’re predisposed to accept this misconception because of their adherence to the traditional workday. In order to quell their fears though, I’m going to offer a rough outline of my nontraditional workday. Let me warn you in advance that just reading this can be draining, and when we get to the part where I take a nap, you might need one too.


9:00 a.m. (EST): Alarm clock on phone rings. I always find the most refreshing sleep to be the nap you take after waking up in the morning.


11:08: The midday heat now makes it uncomfortable to remain in bed and my body wakes me up. I immediately assess who is home and confirm that I’m alone.


11:10: I turn the shower on.


11:15: The steam is at an acceptable level so I enter the bathroom and read a magazine or watch Tonight Show clips on my computer.


11:30: I get into the shower.


11:55: I finish off the rest of television shows that are in my online queue list. I need to remain vigilant for the sake of my blog.


1:05 p.m.: Nothing of note on television last night, so I post some random thoughts about an actor who had ten seconds of screen time during House.


1:20: Time to work out. My day isn’t done until I see three naked old guys, sweat enough that my underwear appears soiled and ogled some stay at home moms. The YMCA fills all these requirements.


2:45: I settle down for a late lunch, which doesn’t feel that late since my last meal was around midnight.


3:35: I write an article for The Scene that details how hard the job market is or exaggerates my most recent job search. My hope is that the article will keep my mom off my back. (Somewhere a writer with something important to say is crying.)


4:05: As a reward for my efforts I settle down on the couch for a catnap. That’s when my cat Stewart and I sleep together.


5:00: My internal alarms go off in anticipation of my dad’s return. Rousing myself awake I settle down at my computer, which has a half-written cover letter ready for my completion. We exchange pleasantries and I finish the letter. Tomorrow I’ll find somewhere to send it.


6:30: My mom calls to say she won’t be home for dinner. I’m on my own, which is fine because I ate a box of cookies before my nap (I didn’t tell you because I was ashamed).


6:40: I close my door and watch three hours of television programming for four years ago. I then write a blog post about it for my own satisfaction.


10:00: My mom pokes her head into my room. I ask her to review my cover letter. I then announce I’m going to bed, which ensures I can watch television in my room without intrusion for the rest of the night.


12:15 a.m.: Craving something substantial I go downstairs for food after everyone else is tucked in bed. I put together a plate of frozen burritos, some pepperoni and macaroni salad. With my picnic in tow I head back upstairs.


12:20: I work on my book, which is a fictionalizing of my life that I’ve attempted at various points in my life and have never finished.


3:05: Can’t keep my eyes open. Instead of shutting my laptop off I just close it, so that it’s warm glow will act as a friendly companion in bed.


3:35: I think I hear my dad patrolling the house.


4:04: My mom startles me awake to find out if the cat is in my room. I throw a pillow at her, because I assume she is an intruder there to murder me, and confirm the cat is asleep at my feet. I go back to sleep for good.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Job Relief

(Editor's Note: A version of this column appeared in THE SARATOGIAN'S online section, THE SCENE.)
At a time when jobs are hard to come by, I was able to find work for two weekends this December promoting phones at malls. The job fell into my lap after executing a Web search in the fields of marketing and promotions.

Theoretically I was looking for something that would use my creative mind and experience running events for Ben & Jerry’s. Ultimately the work relied only on my ability to stand upright and memorize some talking points, effectively operating as a human fishing pole. Using free phone grips and the promise of a $10,000 giveaway as bait, we attempted to catch shoppers who would enter their e-mails into the computer at our kiosk for a chance to win a big prize before being thrown back.

Performing the task of an inanimate object was soul crushing and demeaning at times, but I wouldn’t be averse to similar opportunities in the near future. The money was amazing, as it needed to be to avoid eighth amendment violations. But the real attraction was the experience and the insights it provided into my personality, corporate life and the world around me.

In terms of my own personality, I found out that I don’t always need to bite off my nose to spite my face. I think that discovery coincided with my realizations that Dilbert really is a reflection of reality, and the workers of the world will always bond over their subjugated lot in life.

This last aspect provided the most entertainment and afforded me a chance to escape the relative bubble that has surrounded me during the course of my life, as I have interacted with a relatively similar slew of characters.

In particular there was one coworker who challenged some of my perceptions about people, specifically in terms of packaging, and ingrained in me the idea that life doesn’t necessarily need to fit some cookie cutter mold to be fulfilling and sustainable. I learned how a nasal septum piercing is a sign of self-expression, not a label for the person who wears it, and I realized that you can live without a safety net, as long as you’re willing to pick yourself up when you fall.

But more resonating than any lessons I may have gleaned was the fun I had. Fun that stemmed from a late-night exchange in a hotel weight room and public dance-offs, all of which represented a break from the monotony of what my life has become.

I’m not depressed, just bored with a repetitious life that seems stalled at this point. Ultimately this adventure served as a pit-stop where I could refuel and get a better grasp of my bearings. In essence it was a vacation that paid for itself (I could use a per diem in my normal life).

So the next time you go about recharging your batteries, remember that rejuvenation requires a rebirth of sorts, which could just mean a brief interlude down a path you’ve never traversed. Life doesn’t need to be a constant experimentation, but at least a little experimenting allows us to discover what works for us.

Die Bill Lawrence. Die.

So I think I figured out why Scrubs: THE NEW CLASS is still on the air. SCrubs creator Bill Lawrence has a death wish, and he wants me to make his dreams come true. I'm not saying i'm going to murder him, but I will manslaughter him. That means we'll be in a scenario where he could die by my hands, and he will die by my hands, even though I don't want that result (wink wink).
I think a nice feature for this blog would be a few descriptions of how bad Scrubs: THe New Class is every week. Let's see if this works....
David Franco is so bad on Scrubs: The New CLass (TNC) that I want to go back in time and murder his parents, even if that means denying the world his older brother James.

Start slow and build I will. Talk like Yoda, continue I must.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Award Season


With the Holiday season over it is now time for the Award Season to roll into town. I will be doing my own movie awards, with nominations soon to come. But, I need suggestions on award names. Also, if people have suggestions for unusual categories I would be very receptive to any ideas.

Bowl Me Over

When you're up after 2 in the morning you began to find hidden gems on the internet. Since I'd feel awkward telling you about the porn I find, I guess I can recommend this amazing ESPN video.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4077430

What you've got there, is a challenge match between the BOWLER of the YEAR and PTI host Michael Wilbon. Wilbon was spotted like 60 pints in the match, which stemmed from verbal challenges he made on television and some comments he made about plastic balls (Who knew there were plastic balls?).
The video is pretty captivating, and not just because Wilbon looks like my grandmother when he bowls (both are dead). To be fair, he could probably beat me on our best days. The real entertainment, though, is derived from the announcers, who are hilarious. I've never heard off the cuff rants like this except by Jeff Van Gundy. No idea who these guys are, but they make the video.
Check it out. If you're like me, it's either this or an episode of Heroes I don't want to watch.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

It's Getting Hairy...

The trailer for the newest Harry Potter movie, the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 has been leaked on to the internet. I say leaked because it is essentially nowhere, and was pulled from one website that claimed to have it.
Luckily, i snagged it quickly. Check this minute long teaser out before it gets moved or killed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHfR_1w4rQE


Seems ok. Ultimately, though the movie will suck.

Julie and Julia (and like 1 million calories)

Julie and Julia is a movie that would benefit from a lot less Julie and more Julia. For good measure I would probably increase the amount of Stanley Tucci's character, Paul Child. This movie is almost at war with itself, with one story heartwarming and enchanting, while the other one drags on and drags you down with it.
Let me begin with the bad, which in this case is Amy Adams. Adams plays Julie Powell, an aspiring blogger whose gimmick is that she's recreating Child's recipes in one year. Seems interesting enough and (spoiler alert) I'm glad she was able to accomplish her goal. THe problem with this plot is that it's no fun, lacks any real adversity and demands us to root for or at least feel for a crazy shrew who doesn't appear to gain any weight (this made me hate her more during the movie).
Adams can play likable and cute, it's basically her thing. When she tries her hand at a working woman she is unable to straddle the line of humanity that people struggle with, and ultimately becomes a stereotype. She devolves into a whiner at her best and a raging ingrate at her worst. Not exactly fun to watch.
What might be even worse is how much she resents her charming apartment. Honestly, it's the neatest place. It's not like they have kids. She needs to lighten up. That idea could apply to everything about her in this movie. If she had just scaled it back a few degrees I think her part would have been a nice compliment to the Meryl Streep part. Even in this imaginary version of her storyline, I think we would have been fine with a movie just about Julia Child.
Based on her performance in the movie, I can easily assert that Meryl Streep could have carried this movie by herself. She is a joy on the screen, as is Tucci as her husband. I would have loved further exploration of their marriage, which is so much fun to watch.
Maybe this story wouldn't have had a lot of conflict, but I don't care. They could have added a graphic sex scene or revealed where her show came from. That wouldn't be interesting? THat wouldn't have held our attention? This doens't need to be Julie/Julia in the vein of Frost/Nixon. It's not like the characters are involved with each other. They never even meet!
As I think about this more and more I'm struggling to understand why I ever had to hear the name Julie Powell or watch Amy Adams try to capture her likeness.
Anyway, I'm going to stop before I freak out more about something that probably couldn't matter less.

Best Movies of the Decade

Ranking the ten best movie of the decade is a daunting task, especially if you’re going to actually review movies with a critical eye. So as not to overreach and exceed my actual reviewing capabilities, my list will be based solely on what I like, thought was original, had rewatchability and maybe spoke to me. If I start talking in artsy fartsy terms it would be an insult to you the reader and would ultimately leave a bad taste in my mouth from all the B.S. I would be spewing.
What you have as a result of this criteria is my top 9 movies of the decade. This is not a list you will see anywhere else, least of which is because most critics use round numbers. Well, I’m not a critic. I’m a reluctant adult who was given a forum to spout his stupid ideas.
(Editor’s Note: We concur with David’s assessment of his talent. As a result of this, we don’t edit his blog very well. And by very well, I mean we have a monkey that hits spell check and randomly decides whether to hit change, ignore or add to dictionary. The monkey has been dead for two weeks and there has been no difference. We mourn Jerry the Monkey)
10. Almost Famous (2000)/Sideways (2004) /Adventureland (2009) (tie)
• First of all, these movies did not make my list. They came close, but ultimately fell short because I didn’t feel like I could defend any of these choices. The knock against Almost Famous is that it is too long, Kate Hudson wears on me and I often fall asleep. Sideways didn’t make the list because I’m not familiar enough with it to be sure that I don’t like the idea of the movie better than the movie itself. As for Adventureland, well, it felt weird including a movie that wasn’t top four for the year.
On the plus side, all of these movies reverberate strongly with me. Almost Famous and Adventureland capture my youthful naïveté, desire for adventure and general isolation. Sideways is an exploration of the protagonists in Almost Famous and Adventureland if they never got any breaks and gave in to their lesser demons. I’m terrified that I will become Paul Giamatti in Sideways; an underachiever who is a snob with no reason to be a snob and loves to drunk dial the women who won’t have him.
Ok, they’re all in. I think my soft upbringing and living under No Child Left Behind has biased me against not including everyone. So c’mon boys, you’re all in.
9. Mean Girls (2004)
• You want to talk rewatchability? I once watched this movie twice in a row. I wasn’t the only one either, as my bother and Alex eagerly joined me on the second go around. So not only is this movie timeless, yeah I said timeless, it also crosses the gender gap. Any movie that is written by a woman and is about women deserves major props for appealing to men. It is appealing because it is funny. It is extremely quotable.
Oh, and in terms of its appeal to men, the cast is extremely hot. This is Lindsay Lohan in her prime, and that might even refer to her acting too. The sleeper pick of this movie is Lacey Chabert, who really brings it in the absence of a hot looking Rachel McAdams (let’s be honest, she sucks as a blond). But I digress, except to say that the greatest shame of this movie is how it presents Lizzy Caplan. She plays the dowdy friend, who in reality is super hot. If you watch True Blood you’ll remember her as Jason’s girlfriend that was addicted to V. Remember? Yeah, she was wicked hot.
Back to the movie, which presents a pretty accurate caricature of High Shool life. Tina Fey’s script walks a dangerous line, where it almost becomes a cliché, but ultimately it is refreshing and truthful. I mean let’s be honest, women are catty and guys secretly dig math nerds that look like Lindsay Lohan (uh duh).
8. Anchorman (2004)
• Ever wonder what a big screen adaptation of 30 Rock would look like? Well it would be a speedy joyride filled with inane and secretly high brow jokes. It would be Anchorman. Don’t believe me, well I’m not convinced either, but it makes some sense.
This is not a high concept think piece by any comedic standards. Essentially it is an SNL skit that works really well over 97 minutes. Will Ferrell has created a character in Ron Burgundy who is able to hold our attention throughout the movie, because he has such a strong supporting cast. The supporting cast includes Steve Carell and Paul Rudd in their breakout roles. They represent the strength of this movie, in that you’ve got All-Stars settling for role player roles and executing their parts perfectly. I mean c’mon, Tim Robbins is in this movie!!!! Seth Rogen is credited in this movie as “Eager Cameraman!” And Jerry Stiller played man in bar, in an unaccredited role. This is the LOVE ACTUALLY of comedies.
Anchorman has a high giggle level quotient, just in terms of 70’s lingo and dress, which makes everything better. This movie isn’t pretending to be anything other than funny, and I’m not mad. Frankly, I’m impressed.
7. Dark Knight (2008)
• What you have here is an exciting movie, which is visually stunning and contains one of the greatest performances I’ve ever had the pleasure to see.
The adrenaline rush of this movie is the result of a tight script that never rests on its laurels. From the opening bank heist our perceptions of what is possible in a superhero movie are challenged, as we see that they can be smart and inventive. Maybe it becomes too preachy at points, but that’s what keeps it grounded in comic book lore. To a certain extent we’re supposed to gag at Harvey Dent’s lofty dialogue or Commissioner Gordon’s hard-on for Batman. What makes this tolerable is that the rest of the Dark Knight is unconventional and grim.
It’s the way this vision is conveyed, through the artful hand of Director Christopher Nolan, which ultimately explains why the story is so compelling (I’ll make this part quick). The Gotham he creates feels very real, yet at the same time exudes the dirty underbelly and grandness that only exists in this fictional city. In addition, the sweeping shots that characterize the movie allow you to swallow it all up.
What sets this movie above something like Heat, which it looks similar to stylistically, is the performance of Heath Ledger. I’ve seen this movie probably five times all the way through. On three separate occasions I’ve sat down and just watched the scenes with the Joker. The makeup probably helps, but the way Ledger sinks into that role and becomes the character is transcendent. I for one think he should have been nominated in the Best Actor category, since he carries the movie on his shoulders as the real lead. Other actors might have done good things with this role, in fact I want Joseph Gordon Levitt to take it over, but only he was able to create the awe inspiring villain that made this one of the best movies of the decade.
6. Old School (2003)
• If I told you that Animal House is one of my favorite movies of all time, would you be surprised? Old School represents an adaptation of Animal House, which might not be as funny, but does strike many of the same notes.
This was the breakout movie for Will Ferell and Vince Vaughn, with both actors carving out niches they would recreate for the rest of the decade. Ferell, as the loose cannon who becomes a destructive Atomic-Bomb, is made from the same mold as John Belushi’s “Bluto.” In creating his character, Ferell captures Belushi’s likeability, but offers his catch-phrase laden verbiage instead of Belushi’s facial tics and physical humor. As for Vaughn, he is the 21st century version of Tim Matheson, regardless of what Van Wilder tried to be with Ryan Reynolds. As a reluctant family man who found refuge in a fraternity of misfits, Vaughn created a persona that continued to make me laugh in subsequent films. Director Todd Phillips deserves massive credit for bringing out these two performances in Old School (He also got a great performance from Elisha Cuthbert’s ass and made me not hate Ellen Pompeo for most of the movie).
As for Luke Wilson, he adequately plays the straight man in the movie. Wilson could have made things worse by fighting for laughs, but by not striving for the spotlight he kills it with lines like this gem from the wedding: “True love is hard to find, sometimes you think you have true love and then you catch the early flight home from San Diego and a couple of nude people jump out of your bathroom blindfolded like a goddamn magic show ready to double team your girlfriend...“
This is not some dumb movie that should just be written off as a worthless collection of guy jokes. Exhibit A would be the fact this movie has political strategist James Carville and Exhibit B would be the line “I’m here for the gang bang.”
5. Superbad (2007)
• This movie is perfect because of its combination of realism and escapism (Editor’s Note: Dave is about to go off on an English Lit binge here, please humor him. He has deluded himself into thinking he is smart because he owns glasses). In terms of the former, Michael Cera and Jonah Hill verbalize my own views and experience about sex in High School. In addition, there fear of separation heading into college mirrors my own anxiety about making new friends and testing the bonds of old ones. As far as the escapism, the adventures of McLovin are the realization of every geek’s (me) wildest fantasies about the possibilities they were denied in High School. Add these two plots together and you have a story that is heartwarming (yup, I said that) and laugh out loud hilarious. I doubt any movie will capture my generation’s high school experience better than this movie. It is the Dazed and Confused or American Graffiti for the kids that graduated High School between ’98 and ’09.
As far as rewatchability, Alex argues that this movie gets worse every time. I disagree with that assertion to the point that the movie gains new meaning every time I see it as I distance myself from High School. The out and out jokes aren’t funnier, but I laugh harder when I see our protagonists’ attempts to get alcohol, laid and capture the idea of High School.
My only problem with this movie is the idea that Jonah Hill could ever get with Emma Stone’s character. Sure she was nice, and I remember girls who were hot and cool in High School, but they don’t entertain the idea of a hookup with guys that are uglier and fatter than me, like Jonah Hill.

4. In The Loop (2009)
• I’m not tired of talking about this movie, which made the list for the decade after only one viewing. I’ve decided that the best description of this movie is THE WEST WING on crack with British accents and no lofty sense of duty. Sounds depressing right? Well wakeup, it’s hilarious and it is the world we live in!
I’m not sure who my favorite actor was in this movie, since all the British and no-name American actors killed it. I guess the one thing I found refreshing was the fact that James Gandolfini was able to escape the shadow of Tony Soprano. Gandolfini plays a timid American General who masquerades as a liberal with a conscience, while really just being concerned with his political survival.
And while I’m at it, I want to acknowledge Zach Woods for his portrayal of Chad. Chad is an aide who could climb any ladder and will ultimately be the kind of unworthy bureaucrat with actual power someday. I guess you would characterize that as dark humor. Oh well, we’re all screwed, so why not just sit back and enjoy the documentation of our downfall as we outside the loop get a chance to look in.
(Editor’s Note: Let’s not encourage these “smart” wrap-ups. Dave is already so full of himself that he created a fictitious commenter named Steve to have a conversation with. In fact, Alex is really just a man hooker he pays to watch television with him and introduce him to female hookers)
3. Brick (2005)
• Ever wonder what Sam Spade was like in High School? Well his name was Brendan and before he was played by Humphrey Bogart, Joseph Gordon Levitt captured his aura in Brick. Not much else I can say about this whodunit set in a modern High School in the vein of classic film noir. In fact, I like this movie better than anything from 60 or 70 years ago because it is more accessible. That is the ultimate credit to this film, which is that it captures the best of one era and adapts it seamlessly to this era.
What brings this all together is the dynamic performances littered throughout the movie. This movie features a whole host of cool cucumbers, most notably lead Joseph Gordon Levitt. We learned in Ten Things I Hate About You that he could act, but with Brick we recognized the depth of his ability. Levitt introduces himself to the world as possibly one of the best leading men of the next 40 years.
This movie is just cool. It represents a break from reality, but is a fantasy world that many young people can share. Teenagers want to grow up and become adults, and in Brick they get to do that in a familiar context. The real fantasy is that this movie allows smarts to overcome all odds. It beats brawns. It woos beauty. It ultimately has the last say. As a geek with an imagination I love all of this.
2. The Departed (2006)
• I like a good drama, but specifically I like popcorn drama. These are dramatic adult films with at least some mainstream appeal. It’s a combination of blockbuster and art house, which ultimately leads to the best of both worlds. In this decade that movie was The Departed (in the 90s it was L.A. Confidential).
All of these parts add up to make this a great movie…
1. The combination of Marty and Leo. This team gets together and they make magic. I don’t care what the subject is, they complete each other (and I mean that in a totally gay way).
2. Martin Sheen playing Jeb Bartlet as a cop. If his character had lived, I would have voted for him for president. His death scene makes me cry every time I see it. Oh yeah, spoiler alert.
3. Amazing soundtrack, highlighted by The Dropkick Murphy’s “I’m Shipping Up to Boston.”
4. Vera Farmiga. More accurately, Vera Farmiga in heat.
5. Alec Baldwin’s comic relief. His rants steal every scene he is in. It was a sign of things to come with his career.
6. Matt Damon is the perfect weasel in this movie. We never delude ourselves into feeling compassion for this scumbag, even after he is betrayed. I think that’s a good thing, especially since Damon seems so likeable. ACTING!
7. The crazy twists at the end. (Spoiler Alert) As Grandpa Lombardo puts it, “everybody dies.”

1. 40 Year Old Virgin (2005)
• This movie has three things going for it: original and creative story, hilarious one-liners and the appropriate amount of sentimentality.
(Editor’s Note: We of Entertainment Daily wouldn’t begrudge you if this was the last post you ever read. Maybe tomorrow we’ll learn that this was a joke post or that it has been secretly written by a 12 year old boy, and not just someone with the sensibilities and sexual experiences of one)
I still remember when I heard that this story was the plot of a movie. I assumed it would be some Jim Carrey vehicle that would be mildly amusing, with his zany facial expressions and physical humor (I hope he never does another comedy). That movie would have been semi-successful. Thank god it never happened.
Instead, what you get is a story that pulls on your heart strings while taking a baseball bat to your funny bone. This is a combination of Judd Apatow’s writing and the performance of Steve Carell. Carell doesn’t make you feel sorry for his character or make you want to laugh at him, rather you become his champion during the movie. He instills in you the same romantic proclivities that make him such a great guy, while hampering his sex life. All of this is possible because of Apatow’s script, which makes Carell into a real guy and not some strange aberration (aside from that 40 year old virgin thing…). More than the humanity he gives to Carell, is the real world Apatow creates and the real life twists he throws in with the regularity of the obstacles that emerge in life. He masterfully highlights two contrasting worlds, showing us the guy life and the domesticated reality of Catherine Keener’s family. The realization of the different atmospheres is key to the grounding of the movie, in terms of the comedy and the heart.
The one-liners are mostly the product of the hilarious cast, who were given the freedom to do what worked best. The improvisation results in an adlibbed song in Portuguese by Jane Lynch, a series of laughs while Carell gets his chest waxed and allowed us to recognize the evolving bromance between Paul Rudd and Seth Rogen. Besides making us laugh, this improvisation format just added another layer of reality.

So what separates this movie from other creative joke fests, like Starsky and Hutch (deserved a shout out), is that this is a more complete movie. It’s a comedy, yeah, but it’s comedy plus. This is the brand of humor Apatow began exploring with Freaks and Geeks. What you get is Comedy +. The plus represents the human element in this case. I mean you have a gross out comedy with a ridiculous concept, which ultimately deals with real life in a real way. You’ve got adult dating, teenage contraception and the perils of drunk driving (ok, so they make light of that).
Maybe I’m making too much about the movie, and even if I am, it can still rest on the fact that it was funnier than anything else this decade. Except it’s more than a series of laughs and its witty plot. Essentially it is a hilarious coming of age story that was delayed about 20 years ago. That’s funny and touching. That’s the number one movie of the decade.