Thursday, December 31, 2009
In the Loop!
I'm 17 minutes into IN THE LOOP, and unless it becomes guy on guy porn I think this will be my favorite movie of 2009. Never heard of the movie? Don't worry. You will.
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Message From the Editor
To all you avid readers out there, we of ENTERTAINMENT DAILY wanted to extend our best wishes during this holiday season.
At the same time, we would hope that in the new year you continue to read the ramblings of writer David Lombardo. Sure, his writing doesn't really have a lot going on and yeah, his writing style is indicative of a person who is deeply disturbed. There's no but about all of that, we just wanted to let you know we're aware of it too.
Anyway, have a happy holiday and remain vigilant against meat that may be contaminated with e coli.
At the same time, we would hope that in the new year you continue to read the ramblings of writer David Lombardo. Sure, his writing doesn't really have a lot going on and yeah, his writing style is indicative of a person who is deeply disturbed. There's no but about all of that, we just wanted to let you know we're aware of it too.
Anyway, have a happy holiday and remain vigilant against meat that may be contaminated with e coli.
The UP IN THE AIR experience
(Editor’s Note: This post is littered with spoilers. We give fair warning right before the tidbits are revealed. Just skip one sentence, unless otherwise noted. Enjoy)
You know when people say, and mind you these are snobby annoying people like me, that the book is much better than the movie. They drone on and on about how some writer or director misplaced some author’s amazing vision. If you hear anyone doing that about UP IN THE AIR, call them an idiot. Heck, call their bluff, because I don’t think they really read the book, since it stinks.
Ok, it doesn’t actually stink. Walter Kirn’s book of the same name as the movie begins as a fascinating read about the travels of a frequent flyer. Although by Kirn’s description, the label of a frequent flyer falls short of appropriately defining Ryan Bingham’s travels. Bingham immerses himself in his travels, because it is his life. He’s not on a trip, he’s living his life. When he’s “home” is when he’s a stranger in a strange land, partially because he doesn’t have a standard home.
Kirn’s novel begins as the documentation of a corporate assassin who travels around the country with the purpose of amassing one million frequent flyer miles before he leaves his job. In the movie he is going for 10 million miles, but it’s not a big deal.
Unfortunately, while Bingham is detailed, precise and remains on task and schedule, Kirn’s writing doesn’t reflect those same tendencies. The story begins to meander and get discombobulated, as we lose track of the events in the book. (Spoiler alert) Maybe that makes sense, because Ryan is experiencing seizures, but I’m inclined to believe that my frustrations with the story were not the result of a twist and were more likely the product of an ill-conceived delivery.
Honestly, when I think back about the book I don’t know what happened from page 100 to 280. Essentially I got so jet lagged by the story that I forgot where I had been, where I was and where I was going.
It’s all quite sad for a book that does such a beautiful job describing “air world,” it can’t put any coherent thoughts or descriptions together. The action seems unrealistic and scripted in some strange time. The characters all seem phony.
It all comes back to these mysterious seizures, which may explain why I couldn’t understand what was going on, since the narrator didn’t have a handle on his own existence. If that was the case, if all the misdirection was on purpose, then boo this book. Why ruin a fun travel book by making it feel like English class??? Ugh. Then again, all of this rests on the idea that the writer intended to make no sense, which I still don’t buy.
Luckily, (spoiler alert) none of this crap is in the movie!
Basically the movie only shares a couple characters’ names, some direct lines and title. That’s it! The only downside of this is that we still don’t get the fun travel movie, as the movie took on added layers and changed direction in light of the economic climate that forced it to alter its route (that’s a plane analogy).
What you end up with in the movie is a story that explores Ryan’s perceptions about life and the fulfillment of life. This aspect is extremely depressing in the film, since it represents a fact about life that people don’t want to deal with.
Specifically, what is it that gives our lives meaning? Is it the stereotypical stuff, like a spouse, house and perfect black blouse? Or should we only strive for meaningful moments along life? These are the questions addressed in this movie, and while they’re aren’t definitely answered, it seems like director/writer Jason Reitman is trying to say that there’s nothing wrong with opting for the traditional existence.
Reitman doesn’t merely lend credence to this belief, though, and does acknowledge that life requires a break from itself. (Spoiler alert) This idea is embodied by the double life of Alex (Vera Farmiga), who has her jollies on the road, yet ultimately comes home to her “real” life. (THis is supposed to be a twist, but everyone I was with saw it coming) Alex seems to have her life together, which is why I think Reitman is endorsing her lifestyle. She is able to balance her life in such a way that she maximizes her existence. She’s not trapped in a life that was scripted for her.
The opposite could be said about Ryan (George Clooney), who seems trapped in a struggle against the traditional existence. As portrayed by Clooney, Ryan is a man that denigrates common beliefs about love and family, simply because he’s having too much fun to be tied down by those shackles. (spoiler alert) Except in the end, the idea of those shackles is comforting to Ryan, since he goes after Alex in an attempt to settle down.
As written by Reitman the script is extremely tight, realistic and poignant. This is not Diablo Cody’s wandering way of speaking with the employment of constant catch phrases that characterized Retiman’s last film, Juno.
A large dose of the realism of the script stems from the use of real people, who were for the most part reenacting the conditions they were fired under. This was a late addition to the film, which was the product of Reitman deeming it necessary to increase the role of the tough economy in the movie.
That’s enough deep contemplative thinking until the end, when I deal with the end of the movie. For now, let me just reminisce about the twinkle in Clooney’s eyes, the naked backside of Farmiga, the delight of young actress Anna Kendrick, and tip my hat to the cast of characters that owned their roles.
Clooney can never escape the fact that he is Clooney. He’s not like Matt Damon, who can disappear into a role. He plays a version of George Clooney in every movie, and it’s no different here. It’s nice, though, to see him work with a script that plays to his strengths, specifically his rapid delivery style, a strong female counterbalance and an air of mischievous.
I honestly can’t imagine anyone else playing this role, except for maybe Matt Damon in ten years, since Damon could probably become Clooney. For now, though Clooney is Ryan Bingham. As Bingham, Clooney sells the evolution of the character who sees his world view tested.
Almost outshining Clooney are the female leads, Kendrick and Farmiga, each offering different worldviews. Kendrick plays the young up and comer (absent basically from the book), who has the cookie cutter view of life. We can fire people via satellite, we can mold our perfect man and settling is just a way to make failure acceptable. Kendrick kills as this naïve girl, who actually isn’t that naïve, just young.
On the other hand you have Farmiga, who plays the more grizzled Alex (so different from the one in the book), who seems to have figured out everything with time. She is completely self-aware and its amazing to watch. Farmiga kills in this role, which could have completely fallen apart in the hands of a weaker actress. In Farmiga’s capable hands, the role of Alex comes alive and becomes even more than the words Reitman wrote.
Really can’t say enough about all the actors in this movie, who through Reitman’s directions gave great performances. I would be shocked if Clooney wasn’t nominated for Best Actor comes Oscar season. I do think that Farmiga and Kendrick will end up knocking each other out of contention, but they did each get recognized at the Globes.
Oh yeah, and Danny McBride is good in the movie as Ryan’s future brother-in-law. It was a huge surprise, but he kills it as your average joe, who for a second envisions himself embracing Ryan’s philosophy of life until Ryan talks him out of it. It’s quite funny in a sad and depressing way. Actually a lot of the movie is sad and depressing, yet you’re laughing and find yourself embarrassed about it. I think that’s good, since awkwardness and tension usually generates uncomfortable laughter.
As for the ending (yeah, stop reading now if you haven’t seen the movie. It’s been nice and I’ll talk to you later), I wasn’t that happy. Ryan gets rejected by Alex, since she has a family, and basically is doomed to live alone in “air world,” no matter how much he argues that he’s really not alone. This argument is believe when he posits it earlier in the movie, as he’s got Alex by his side and the world by the stones, but it doesn’t make sense that he would accept this after he’s had his world view altered. I thought he should have killed himself.
Although, maybe his world view wasn’t altered, and the incident with Alex reaffirmed his beliefs. It must have, if he was willing to go back to a life he seemed poised to abandon.
You know when people say, and mind you these are snobby annoying people like me, that the book is much better than the movie. They drone on and on about how some writer or director misplaced some author’s amazing vision. If you hear anyone doing that about UP IN THE AIR, call them an idiot. Heck, call their bluff, because I don’t think they really read the book, since it stinks.
Ok, it doesn’t actually stink. Walter Kirn’s book of the same name as the movie begins as a fascinating read about the travels of a frequent flyer. Although by Kirn’s description, the label of a frequent flyer falls short of appropriately defining Ryan Bingham’s travels. Bingham immerses himself in his travels, because it is his life. He’s not on a trip, he’s living his life. When he’s “home” is when he’s a stranger in a strange land, partially because he doesn’t have a standard home.
Kirn’s novel begins as the documentation of a corporate assassin who travels around the country with the purpose of amassing one million frequent flyer miles before he leaves his job. In the movie he is going for 10 million miles, but it’s not a big deal.
Unfortunately, while Bingham is detailed, precise and remains on task and schedule, Kirn’s writing doesn’t reflect those same tendencies. The story begins to meander and get discombobulated, as we lose track of the events in the book. (Spoiler alert) Maybe that makes sense, because Ryan is experiencing seizures, but I’m inclined to believe that my frustrations with the story were not the result of a twist and were more likely the product of an ill-conceived delivery.
Honestly, when I think back about the book I don’t know what happened from page 100 to 280. Essentially I got so jet lagged by the story that I forgot where I had been, where I was and where I was going.
It’s all quite sad for a book that does such a beautiful job describing “air world,” it can’t put any coherent thoughts or descriptions together. The action seems unrealistic and scripted in some strange time. The characters all seem phony.
It all comes back to these mysterious seizures, which may explain why I couldn’t understand what was going on, since the narrator didn’t have a handle on his own existence. If that was the case, if all the misdirection was on purpose, then boo this book. Why ruin a fun travel book by making it feel like English class??? Ugh. Then again, all of this rests on the idea that the writer intended to make no sense, which I still don’t buy.
Luckily, (spoiler alert) none of this crap is in the movie!
Basically the movie only shares a couple characters’ names, some direct lines and title. That’s it! The only downside of this is that we still don’t get the fun travel movie, as the movie took on added layers and changed direction in light of the economic climate that forced it to alter its route (that’s a plane analogy).
What you end up with in the movie is a story that explores Ryan’s perceptions about life and the fulfillment of life. This aspect is extremely depressing in the film, since it represents a fact about life that people don’t want to deal with.
Specifically, what is it that gives our lives meaning? Is it the stereotypical stuff, like a spouse, house and perfect black blouse? Or should we only strive for meaningful moments along life? These are the questions addressed in this movie, and while they’re aren’t definitely answered, it seems like director/writer Jason Reitman is trying to say that there’s nothing wrong with opting for the traditional existence.Reitman doesn’t merely lend credence to this belief, though, and does acknowledge that life requires a break from itself. (Spoiler alert) This idea is embodied by the double life of Alex (Vera Farmiga), who has her jollies on the road, yet ultimately comes home to her “real” life. (THis is supposed to be a twist, but everyone I was with saw it coming) Alex seems to have her life together, which is why I think Reitman is endorsing her lifestyle. She is able to balance her life in such a way that she maximizes her existence. She’s not trapped in a life that was scripted for her.
The opposite could be said about Ryan (George Clooney), who seems trapped in a struggle against the traditional existence. As portrayed by Clooney, Ryan is a man that denigrates common beliefs about love and family, simply because he’s having too much fun to be tied down by those shackles. (spoiler alert) Except in the end, the idea of those shackles is comforting to Ryan, since he goes after Alex in an attempt to settle down.
As written by Reitman the script is extremely tight, realistic and poignant. This is not Diablo Cody’s wandering way of speaking with the employment of constant catch phrases that characterized Retiman’s last film, Juno.
A large dose of the realism of the script stems from the use of real people, who were for the most part reenacting the conditions they were fired under. This was a late addition to the film, which was the product of Reitman deeming it necessary to increase the role of the tough economy in the movie.
That’s enough deep contemplative thinking until the end, when I deal with the end of the movie. For now, let me just reminisce about the twinkle in Clooney’s eyes, the naked backside of Farmiga, the delight of young actress Anna Kendrick, and tip my hat to the cast of characters that owned their roles.
Clooney can never escape the fact that he is Clooney. He’s not like Matt Damon, who can disappear into a role. He plays a version of George Clooney in every movie, and it’s no different here. It’s nice, though, to see him work with a script that plays to his strengths, specifically his rapid delivery style, a strong female counterbalance and an air of mischievous.
I honestly can’t imagine anyone else playing this role, except for maybe Matt Damon in ten years, since Damon could probably become Clooney. For now, though Clooney is Ryan Bingham. As Bingham, Clooney sells the evolution of the character who sees his world view tested.
Almost outshining Clooney are the female leads, Kendrick and Farmiga, each offering different worldviews. Kendrick plays the young up and comer (absent basically from the book), who has the cookie cutter view of life. We can fire people via satellite, we can mold our perfect man and settling is just a way to make failure acceptable. Kendrick kills as this naïve girl, who actually isn’t that naïve, just young.
On the other hand you have Farmiga, who plays the more grizzled Alex (so different from the one in the book), who seems to have figured out everything with time. She is completely self-aware and its amazing to watch. Farmiga kills in this role, which could have completely fallen apart in the hands of a weaker actress. In Farmiga’s capable hands, the role of Alex comes alive and becomes even more than the words Reitman wrote.
Really can’t say enough about all the actors in this movie, who through Reitman’s directions gave great performances. I would be shocked if Clooney wasn’t nominated for Best Actor comes Oscar season. I do think that Farmiga and Kendrick will end up knocking each other out of contention, but they did each get recognized at the Globes.
Oh yeah, and Danny McBride is good in the movie as Ryan’s future brother-in-law. It was a huge surprise, but he kills it as your average joe, who for a second envisions himself embracing Ryan’s philosophy of life until Ryan talks him out of it. It’s quite funny in a sad and depressing way. Actually a lot of the movie is sad and depressing, yet you’re laughing and find yourself embarrassed about it. I think that’s good, since awkwardness and tension usually generates uncomfortable laughter.
As for the ending (yeah, stop reading now if you haven’t seen the movie. It’s been nice and I’ll talk to you later), I wasn’t that happy. Ryan gets rejected by Alex, since she has a family, and basically is doomed to live alone in “air world,” no matter how much he argues that he’s really not alone. This argument is believe when he posits it earlier in the movie, as he’s got Alex by his side and the world by the stones, but it doesn’t make sense that he would accept this after he’s had his world view altered. I thought he should have killed himself.
Although, maybe his world view wasn’t altered, and the incident with Alex reaffirmed his beliefs. It must have, if he was willing to go back to a life he seemed poised to abandon.
Are You Experienced?
Steven Soderbergh is best known for directing the Ocean's Eleven, Erin Brokovich, Out of Sight and Sex, Lies and Videotape. His credits include other impressive movies that he produced or directed, but THE GIRLFRIEND EXPERIENCE will not be remembered as one of his best.
The film, which briefly follows the life of a high end escort (I say briefly because the movie is 77 minutes), doesn't accomplish anything. To say it's boring wouldn't be true, since the movie captivated my interest for most of its screen time. Unfortunately the movie appealed to my prurient interest and nothing more.
Ultimately, this movie is nothing more than a chance for a real life porn star (Sasha Grey) to exhibit her acting credentials. Without that twist I wouldn't have even tuned in. She isn't half bad in the movie, with her most compelling trait being her ability to cue my interest. Unfortunately I can't tell if that's from her on-screen persona or her off-screen persona. I guess I would say that she's interesting and I wouldn't mind seeing her again in something else.
The movie relies on a disjointed style of storytelling that brings nothing to the table and only adds conclusion. The movie is very dark and the sound is shoddy, which reflects the on the go style of film making that Soderbergh employed in this movie.
There are also constant references to the 2008 presidential election, since the movie is set in the period leading up to the election, but this adds nothing to the movie. Maybe it was supposed to add a measure of realism with all the talk of politics and the economy. In the end it just felt like I was watching the worst documentary ever.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
ZOMBIELAND
In my mind there are two really good zombie movies. Movies that go beyond cheap thrills, and are actually good movies. Those two movies are 28 DAYS LATER and SHAUN OF THE DEAD. ZOMBIELAND might deserve inclusion as the third zombie movie that succeeds as a movie.
Eerily reminiscent in tone to SHAUN, ZOMBIELAND claims its own identity with higher stakes, more adept humans and no chance of a normal life.
The movie is first and foremost a comedy, with action scenes only for comedic affect. The lead, Jesse Eisenberg, narrates our journey, as Columbus, the scared youth who has learned to overcome his insecurities and frailties to survive. Joined by Woody Harrelson, Emma Stone and Abigail Breslin, he basically just sort of wanders around, with the ultimate destination being a theme park in California.
There is no plot to this movie. There is simply four characters who are living in a world, where they seem to be the only humans alive (except for a really fun cameo!). It is a testimony to the script of the movie and the skill of the actors that this doesn't quickly devolve into a snooze.
Credit the likeability of the actors, including Eisenberg, who usually pisses me off, for carrying this movie to success.
The movie is 82 minutes long, but feels like it's about 45. I think that's a good thing. This is not high art by any stretch of the imagination, but it's entertaining. That's not a bad thing, just me stating a fact.
Go rent Zombieland. It's good. And watch Shaun of the dead, because it's great.
Eerily reminiscent in tone to SHAUN, ZOMBIELAND claims its own identity with higher stakes, more adept humans and no chance of a normal life.
The movie is first and foremost a comedy, with action scenes only for comedic affect. The lead, Jesse Eisenberg, narrates our journey, as Columbus, the scared youth who has learned to overcome his insecurities and frailties to survive. Joined by Woody Harrelson, Emma Stone and Abigail Breslin, he basically just sort of wanders around, with the ultimate destination being a theme park in California.
There is no plot to this movie. There is simply four characters who are living in a world, where they seem to be the only humans alive (except for a really fun cameo!). It is a testimony to the script of the movie and the skill of the actors that this doesn't quickly devolve into a snooze.
Credit the likeability of the actors, including Eisenberg, who usually pisses me off, for carrying this movie to success.
The movie is 82 minutes long, but feels like it's about 45. I think that's a good thing. This is not high art by any stretch of the imagination, but it's entertaining. That's not a bad thing, just me stating a fact.
Go rent Zombieland. It's good. And watch Shaun of the dead, because it's great.
Getting ready for movie list
Readers. Friends. Steve.
I don't feel equipped to give you an adequate list of the top ten movies in 2009, as I haven't seen enough of the potential candidates. For that reason, i am now embarking on a movie binging. I have just begun Zombieland and the rest will include...
1. Up in the Air
2. Inglourious Basterds
3. In the Loop
4. Fantastic Mr. Fox
5. Up (maybe)
6. Jeniffer's Body
Hopefully I can get to all these movies. I will not have time to see the HURT LOCKER until after the year is over, so that will not make the cut. When I see it, i may have to amend my list.
Oh yeah, Alex doesn't know it yet, but i'm watching some of these at his house tomorrow.
ADDITIONAL COMMENT (TUESDAY MORNING): Fitting in "Up in the Air" today as a matinée. Couldn't find IN THE LOOP or FANTASTIC MR. FOX online, does anyone have a link?????
I don't feel equipped to give you an adequate list of the top ten movies in 2009, as I haven't seen enough of the potential candidates. For that reason, i am now embarking on a movie binging. I have just begun Zombieland and the rest will include...
1. Up in the Air
2. Inglourious Basterds
3. In the Loop
4. Fantastic Mr. Fox
5. Up (maybe)
6. Jeniffer's Body
Hopefully I can get to all these movies. I will not have time to see the HURT LOCKER until after the year is over, so that will not make the cut. When I see it, i may have to amend my list.
Oh yeah, Alex doesn't know it yet, but i'm watching some of these at his house tomorrow.
ADDITIONAL COMMENT (TUESDAY MORNING): Fitting in "Up in the Air" today as a matinée. Couldn't find IN THE LOOP or FANTASTIC MR. FOX online, does anyone have a link?????
Monday, December 28, 2009
Top Ten Shows of the Decade
When rating the top ten television shows of the decade I tried to consider not just great seasons, but the how a show performed over its life. For that reason, a show like Scrubs doesn’t make the cut, since there was no consistency in its performance. Arrested Development had only a three year run, but it has almost no equal in terms of funny and therefore makes the cut. Anyway, there is a lot to disagree with here, especially since my defenses will probably suck. So let’s get to it.
10. Always Sunny in Philadelphia (2005-Present)
• This show is not nearly as original as it may seem. Essentially it is a rip off of Seinfeld, with its intertwined plots and morally bankrupt characters. That being said, it’s a very good rip off of the best show from the 90s, which is why it makes the top ten for this decade.
Utilizing the freedom of cable television, ALWAYS SUNNY was able to abandon broad comedy. At the same time, though, the show never shied away from generic gross out humor. Ultimately the show ended up carving out a niche for itself that was both high brow in its commentary, but extremely low brow in its delivery.
ALWAYS SUNNY has, throughout its tenure, remained a show written and starring a group of friends who have been given an outlet for their inane, ridiculous and contemplative thoughts. The imagination of those thoughts is hilarious, original and awe inspiring considering how much is accomplished in such a little scope.
9. Battlestar Galactica (2004-2009)
• This reimagining of the campy sci-fi hit of the past is an experience. In its entirety it represent a body of work that has few peers. If there was a downside it was only that the sum was so much greater than any of its parts, which made some episodes a chore to watch. Ultimately, though, the whole experience was a delight.
This was a show that could honestly claim to be a drama in space, rather than a space show with dramatic elements. But the science-fiction was not absent on this show. Instead it was another player, like a plot device or an actor.
In BATTLESTAR you had a show that could sweep you away with its vision and grandeur. It was so big, existing in a world seemingly too large for television. All of this, and I haven’t even gotten to the sexy Cylons, who represent some of the best villains ever on television. Oh yeah, this is also the hottest show of the decade that didn’t use nudity.
8. (TIE) King of the Hill/Malcolm in the Middle (1997-2009/2000-2006)
• Neither show was original its creation, with each representing a traditional family sitcom. But while other shows relied on gimmicks and breaks from reality, HILL and MALCOLM seemed to go the other way, finding humor in the mundane aspects of life.
But the great scripts carried these shows only so far, with MALCOLM in particular exhibiting some standout acting. The parents, as played by Bryan Cranston and Jane Kaczmarek were simply amazing in their portrayal of a couple deeply in love, who struggled with the day to day exercise of running a family, supporting them financially and retaining their sanity. Both were repeat emmy nominees, and it’s a travesty that they never received more recognition.
The actors on HILL were no slouches either, with Mike Judge and Kathy Najimy embodying two generic parents just through their voices.
Both shows captured life in the tiniest details. The mom jeans. The dumb dad stories. Kids just being kids. If you ever need a break from your family, I’d always recommend a stay with theirs.
7. The Sopranos (1999-2007)
• The Sopranos tenure can be summed up in an early episode that involves Tony taking his daughter on a college visit, during which he kills an old partner in crime. This episode embodies the realism and escapism the show balanced so very well, as it delivered a family drama and a crime family drama.
The world David Chase created is not some foreign object to viewers, since the world is so welcoming and easy to embrace. All of this is possible because of tight writing, great acting and a story that captures our imagination as we willingly go for a little ride that scares us half to death.
The SOPRANOS also deserves credit for showing what television could be. Creative types were limited to the confines of network television, and cable programming didn’t just need to be edgy for edgy sake (OZ). There was a way to use swearing, sex and violence as props, not the whole show. In this regard SOPRANOS was the best.
6. The Daily Show (1996-Present)
• Let’s first address the fact that this show didn’t really mean anything until Jon Stewart came along, and that its coming out party occurred during the 2000 recount. The combination of those two events highlighted a vicious wit in Stewart and put on display a host of correspondents whose skewed take on events was revolutionary.
Anyone who writes this show off as an extended version of Weekend Update, obviously doesn’t watch either program. In this decade the DAILY SHOW has become a daily source of news and commentary for millions of Americans. It was the balance that the show struck between informing and comedy that makes it worthy of our attention. Through its screwball antics and elementary school humor is a social and political commentary that makes the laughs so much more meaningful.
5. The Office (2005-Present)
• Showing up for work has never been as fun as at the midlevel paper company in Scranton. The OFFICE established a new dynamic with its mockumentary style of filmmaking, which has become the trademark of most wannabe witty followers.
What makes the OFFICE great is its strong supporting cast, who are responsible for making a goof show great. By themselves, the core stars (Michael, Pam, Jim and Ryan) could bring the funny, but with Oscar, Kevin, Stanley, Phyllis and a whole host of other players you get the funk and the noise. Essentially the other workers are set dressing for the establishment of a world that we love to watch.
But The Office never fell victim to the trappings of network television, which explains why its ratings are never great, but also how they avoided will they/won’t they clichés and constantly deliver fresh storylines. Now in its 6th year, The OFFICE has never jumped the shark, even while constantly reinventing itself, and that’s a testament to the quality of the writing.
4. The West Wing (1999-2006)
• I try to ignore the last three seasons of THE WEST WING, as they were done without Aaron Sorkin, the show’s creator and head writer. His absence resulted in a West Wing-lite, which looked familiar and sounded familiar, but wasn’t the same show. In many respects that created a less enjoyable experience, although it does reflect the changing nature of any white house. Granted, that was never the goal, yet it does allow me to forgive the last three season (They weren’t that bad. Especially the Presidential race arc).
When the WEST WING debuted it really had no peers in terms of the size and scope of its aim. It was a very expensive show, and that money paid dividends as far as the reality they created. For most people, myself included, this show created our perceptions about politics and D.C. That was only possible because of the artful direction of the show, but also because of the writing.
Oh the writing, which was vintage Aaron Sorkin. The pitter patter that had been building since Sports Night and THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT finally hit its perfect beat in this show, with the lofty exchange of ideals and jokes flowing like a river that I anxiously awaited to wash over me.
None of that would have been possible without adequate mouthpieces, which THE WEST WING had in spades (that’s an expression, right?). Helmed by Martin Sheen, but firing big guns all the way down to Donna the secretary or some random guest star (Oliver Platt), the WEST WING was an exhibition for actors to highlight their craft. While those who couldn’t talk and walk need not apply, for everyone else it offered meaty roles with juicy lines.
Now as we enjoy our dramas in packages of 12, 16 or 20 episodes, THE WEST WING provided a full roster of episodes. This is a demand on network shows that normally results in peaks and valleys during the season, but it wasn’t the case here.
3. Lost (2004-2010)
• I’m done talking about Lost. You either get it or you don’t. If not, then what you’re missing is a thriller. You’re missing love stories, action, comedy and mysteries. Yeah, it’s complicated, but do you like your food chewed for you too? Do you? What, you’re a baby bird so you do? Ok. That’s fine.
If you’ve skipped this psychological experiment that doubles as an episode joy ride, then don’t worry, because it will be amazing once it’s all together on DVD.
2. Arrested Development (2003-2006)
• There’s really nothing I can say that will articulate how good ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT was. It was a show that was so layered with funny that I routinely had to watch it a second or third time to appreciate all the jokes. The running jokes went beyond a season and lasted for an entire series. The plot twists were nothing short of an M. Night Shymalan movie. The acting represented an ensemble cast that will never be matched in terms of quality (never. Not even close).
This show lasted three years, and chronicled the adventures of the Bluth family. This group of misfits couldn’t help but get in their own way, and each week was a delight as they just tried to survive. At its heart was a father and son drama, which was sabotaged by the surrounding elements.
1. The Wire (2002-2008)
• Did you watch The Wire? I didn’t think so. Apparently no one did, except white latte sipping yuppies who like to see how the other half lives. Besides from the lattes I essentially fit that mold, except for the fact that I don’t care how the other half lives. For me, the interest in THE WIRE stems from its superb acting, amazing stories and realistic dialogue that doesn’t sound as phony as actors on other cop shows look.
Let’s get the big stuff out of the way regarding THE WIRE, specifically the social and political commentary it offers. The underlying theme is that the world we live in is broke. It doesn’t offer a way out, but merely serves as a wakeup call. Ok, that was for the NY TIMES crowd that was slumming it or arrived at my blog accidentally.
The good stuff is the episode by episode action. Drive primarily by Det. James McNulty, THE WIRE was a continuous battle of wits between the cops and their evil enemies (drug crews, politicians, dockworkers). In that struggle were laughs, tears and gut wrenching moments that made you stop. Not stop and think, but just stop. Anything that can stop you in your tracks like that has to be good.
The dialogue of THE WIRE seems real. I think that’s a big compliment, considering the most cop shows are littered with clichés or sound like they should be spoken by someone else, who probably isn’t a cop.
I need to stop the floodgates now before I start a flood. I’ll leave you with the fact that THE WIRE has been the best forum for black actors ever.
So that’s my list. What do you think? Agree? Disagree? Leave something, even if it’s to tell me I suck. Because while I’m sure my mom would disagree on that front, I will admit the argument has some merit. Let’s talk.
10. Always Sunny in Philadelphia (2005-Present)
• This show is not nearly as original as it may seem. Essentially it is a rip off of Seinfeld, with its intertwined plots and morally bankrupt characters. That being said, it’s a very good rip off of the best show from the 90s, which is why it makes the top ten for this decade.
Utilizing the freedom of cable television, ALWAYS SUNNY was able to abandon broad comedy. At the same time, though, the show never shied away from generic gross out humor. Ultimately the show ended up carving out a niche for itself that was both high brow in its commentary, but extremely low brow in its delivery.
ALWAYS SUNNY has, throughout its tenure, remained a show written and starring a group of friends who have been given an outlet for their inane, ridiculous and contemplative thoughts. The imagination of those thoughts is hilarious, original and awe inspiring considering how much is accomplished in such a little scope.
9. Battlestar Galactica (2004-2009)
• This reimagining of the campy sci-fi hit of the past is an experience. In its entirety it represent a body of work that has few peers. If there was a downside it was only that the sum was so much greater than any of its parts, which made some episodes a chore to watch. Ultimately, though, the whole experience was a delight.
This was a show that could honestly claim to be a drama in space, rather than a space show with dramatic elements. But the science-fiction was not absent on this show. Instead it was another player, like a plot device or an actor.
In BATTLESTAR you had a show that could sweep you away with its vision and grandeur. It was so big, existing in a world seemingly too large for television. All of this, and I haven’t even gotten to the sexy Cylons, who represent some of the best villains ever on television. Oh yeah, this is also the hottest show of the decade that didn’t use nudity.
8. (TIE) King of the Hill/Malcolm in the Middle (1997-2009/2000-2006)
• Neither show was original its creation, with each representing a traditional family sitcom. But while other shows relied on gimmicks and breaks from reality, HILL and MALCOLM seemed to go the other way, finding humor in the mundane aspects of life.
But the great scripts carried these shows only so far, with MALCOLM in particular exhibiting some standout acting. The parents, as played by Bryan Cranston and Jane Kaczmarek were simply amazing in their portrayal of a couple deeply in love, who struggled with the day to day exercise of running a family, supporting them financially and retaining their sanity. Both were repeat emmy nominees, and it’s a travesty that they never received more recognition.
The actors on HILL were no slouches either, with Mike Judge and Kathy Najimy embodying two generic parents just through their voices.
Both shows captured life in the tiniest details. The mom jeans. The dumb dad stories. Kids just being kids. If you ever need a break from your family, I’d always recommend a stay with theirs.
7. The Sopranos (1999-2007)
• The Sopranos tenure can be summed up in an early episode that involves Tony taking his daughter on a college visit, during which he kills an old partner in crime. This episode embodies the realism and escapism the show balanced so very well, as it delivered a family drama and a crime family drama.
The world David Chase created is not some foreign object to viewers, since the world is so welcoming and easy to embrace. All of this is possible because of tight writing, great acting and a story that captures our imagination as we willingly go for a little ride that scares us half to death.
The SOPRANOS also deserves credit for showing what television could be. Creative types were limited to the confines of network television, and cable programming didn’t just need to be edgy for edgy sake (OZ). There was a way to use swearing, sex and violence as props, not the whole show. In this regard SOPRANOS was the best.
6. The Daily Show (1996-Present)
• Let’s first address the fact that this show didn’t really mean anything until Jon Stewart came along, and that its coming out party occurred during the 2000 recount. The combination of those two events highlighted a vicious wit in Stewart and put on display a host of correspondents whose skewed take on events was revolutionary.
Anyone who writes this show off as an extended version of Weekend Update, obviously doesn’t watch either program. In this decade the DAILY SHOW has become a daily source of news and commentary for millions of Americans. It was the balance that the show struck between informing and comedy that makes it worthy of our attention. Through its screwball antics and elementary school humor is a social and political commentary that makes the laughs so much more meaningful.
5. The Office (2005-Present)
• Showing up for work has never been as fun as at the midlevel paper company in Scranton. The OFFICE established a new dynamic with its mockumentary style of filmmaking, which has become the trademark of most wannabe witty followers.
What makes the OFFICE great is its strong supporting cast, who are responsible for making a goof show great. By themselves, the core stars (Michael, Pam, Jim and Ryan) could bring the funny, but with Oscar, Kevin, Stanley, Phyllis and a whole host of other players you get the funk and the noise. Essentially the other workers are set dressing for the establishment of a world that we love to watch.
But The Office never fell victim to the trappings of network television, which explains why its ratings are never great, but also how they avoided will they/won’t they clichés and constantly deliver fresh storylines. Now in its 6th year, The OFFICE has never jumped the shark, even while constantly reinventing itself, and that’s a testament to the quality of the writing.
4. The West Wing (1999-2006)
• I try to ignore the last three seasons of THE WEST WING, as they were done without Aaron Sorkin, the show’s creator and head writer. His absence resulted in a West Wing-lite, which looked familiar and sounded familiar, but wasn’t the same show. In many respects that created a less enjoyable experience, although it does reflect the changing nature of any white house. Granted, that was never the goal, yet it does allow me to forgive the last three season (They weren’t that bad. Especially the Presidential race arc).
When the WEST WING debuted it really had no peers in terms of the size and scope of its aim. It was a very expensive show, and that money paid dividends as far as the reality they created. For most people, myself included, this show created our perceptions about politics and D.C. That was only possible because of the artful direction of the show, but also because of the writing.
Oh the writing, which was vintage Aaron Sorkin. The pitter patter that had been building since Sports Night and THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT finally hit its perfect beat in this show, with the lofty exchange of ideals and jokes flowing like a river that I anxiously awaited to wash over me.
None of that would have been possible without adequate mouthpieces, which THE WEST WING had in spades (that’s an expression, right?). Helmed by Martin Sheen, but firing big guns all the way down to Donna the secretary or some random guest star (Oliver Platt), the WEST WING was an exhibition for actors to highlight their craft. While those who couldn’t talk and walk need not apply, for everyone else it offered meaty roles with juicy lines.
Now as we enjoy our dramas in packages of 12, 16 or 20 episodes, THE WEST WING provided a full roster of episodes. This is a demand on network shows that normally results in peaks and valleys during the season, but it wasn’t the case here.
3. Lost (2004-2010)
• I’m done talking about Lost. You either get it or you don’t. If not, then what you’re missing is a thriller. You’re missing love stories, action, comedy and mysteries. Yeah, it’s complicated, but do you like your food chewed for you too? Do you? What, you’re a baby bird so you do? Ok. That’s fine.
If you’ve skipped this psychological experiment that doubles as an episode joy ride, then don’t worry, because it will be amazing once it’s all together on DVD.
2. Arrested Development (2003-2006)
• There’s really nothing I can say that will articulate how good ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT was. It was a show that was so layered with funny that I routinely had to watch it a second or third time to appreciate all the jokes. The running jokes went beyond a season and lasted for an entire series. The plot twists were nothing short of an M. Night Shymalan movie. The acting represented an ensemble cast that will never be matched in terms of quality (never. Not even close).
This show lasted three years, and chronicled the adventures of the Bluth family. This group of misfits couldn’t help but get in their own way, and each week was a delight as they just tried to survive. At its heart was a father and son drama, which was sabotaged by the surrounding elements.
1. The Wire (2002-2008)
• Did you watch The Wire? I didn’t think so. Apparently no one did, except white latte sipping yuppies who like to see how the other half lives. Besides from the lattes I essentially fit that mold, except for the fact that I don’t care how the other half lives. For me, the interest in THE WIRE stems from its superb acting, amazing stories and realistic dialogue that doesn’t sound as phony as actors on other cop shows look.
Let’s get the big stuff out of the way regarding THE WIRE, specifically the social and political commentary it offers. The underlying theme is that the world we live in is broke. It doesn’t offer a way out, but merely serves as a wakeup call. Ok, that was for the NY TIMES crowd that was slumming it or arrived at my blog accidentally.
The good stuff is the episode by episode action. Drive primarily by Det. James McNulty, THE WIRE was a continuous battle of wits between the cops and their evil enemies (drug crews, politicians, dockworkers). In that struggle were laughs, tears and gut wrenching moments that made you stop. Not stop and think, but just stop. Anything that can stop you in your tracks like that has to be good.
The dialogue of THE WIRE seems real. I think that’s a big compliment, considering the most cop shows are littered with clichés or sound like they should be spoken by someone else, who probably isn’t a cop.
I need to stop the floodgates now before I start a flood. I’ll leave you with the fact that THE WIRE has been the best forum for black actors ever.
So that’s my list. What do you think? Agree? Disagree? Leave something, even if it’s to tell me I suck. Because while I’m sure my mom would disagree on that front, I will admit the argument has some merit. Let’s talk.
Saturday, December 26, 2009
LISTEN UP!
http://music.aol.com/video/relator-interface/pete-yorn-and-scarlett-johansson/bc:41752362001
Click that link. You get to listen to Scarlett Johansson and Pete Yorn kill it.
You're welcome.
Click that link. You get to listen to Scarlett Johansson and Pete Yorn kill it.
You're welcome.
It's like Night and Day
Ever wonder why Tom Cruise is a movie star? Do you stop and pause to consider if there is more to Cameron Diaz than her looks? If yes, then let me refer you to the trailer for KNIGHT & DAY.
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3196191769
In the trailer you see the sparkle in Tom Cruise's eye that makes him a movie star. That easy grin that allows him to do the impossible and command a giant screen and our attention. It's all there, in a combination of RISKY BUSINESS and MISSION IMPOSSIBLE, with a heavy dose of the humor he exhibited when working with Ben Stiller for an MTV spot many years ago.
Cameron Diaz also rekindles flames that seemed to have burned out long ago. After phoning it in for years now, whether as Princess Fiona or some sex kitten, she finally seems to be having fun on screen.
This combination should lead to a box office hit. I don't know what this movie is about, but it looks like fun.
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3196191769
In the trailer you see the sparkle in Tom Cruise's eye that makes him a movie star. That easy grin that allows him to do the impossible and command a giant screen and our attention. It's all there, in a combination of RISKY BUSINESS and MISSION IMPOSSIBLE, with a heavy dose of the humor he exhibited when working with Ben Stiller for an MTV spot many years ago.
Cameron Diaz also rekindles flames that seemed to have burned out long ago. After phoning it in for years now, whether as Princess Fiona or some sex kitten, she finally seems to be having fun on screen.
This combination should lead to a box office hit. I don't know what this movie is about, but it looks like fun.
Top Ten shows of 2009
The problem with ranking the best television shows of 2009 stems from the fact that the season of a show extends over two years. So do you judge a show based on when it started, when it finished, or how it performed during the year?
I am judging shows based on when they finished. This affects shows like Glee and Parks and Recreation, which will make the cut in 2010, but not this year. It’s the only fair way to judge a show’s complete arc, and not what it did during a brief period.
Hopefully this list will be inclusive enough for people, sine I watch almost everything. So here it is, in reverse order.
RIP: King of the Hill
• So this show isn’t making the Top Ten, but it does need to be recognized since it went off the air in 2009. HILL was maybe one of the best family sitcoms of all time. Following the life of the Hill family, this show had warmth and laughs.
Since it was a cartoon it was generally overlooked in terms of the quality of the writing and it was also ignored as a rip off of The Simpsons. These two realities will forever bother me.
HILL was never short on creative storylines, as the show did the best job finding the real humor in life. It didn’t rely solely on screwball characters or wacky plots, but was grounded in a reality we could all relate to. I tell you what, I will miss this show. Yup.
10. Chuck
• Odds are you’ve never seen or heard of Chuck, the little action/comedy that narrowly avoided execution after last year’s stellar season. The show revolves around an employee at a big box store called the BUY MORE, who has highly classified data stored in his head. This character, as portrayed by Zachary Levi, is one of the more endearing heroes on television. He is endearing because he is the everyman hero, and this allows us to be swept away on his adventures.
It helps that he has a wicked hot lady friend (Yvonne Strahovski) and a gruff protector (Adam Baldwin), who add laughs, sex appeal and a surprisingly high level of action scenes for a television show.
What ultimately ends up distinguishing this show from its competitors (I guess BURN NOTICE), is the supporting cast of characters that work at the BUY MORE. These guys and girls make the show a legit comedy, so when the action isn’t really working, the laughs are still coming.
Highlight: The penultimate episode includes a wedding in which everything goes wrong, but is just so right for the viewer.
9. Top Chef
• By any standard, this season of TOP CHEF was captivating television. Not much more to say about the show in the wake of my running diaries, which encapsulate the way I feel about this show.
This season had the right balance of talent, personalities and challenges that I doubt they’ll be able to recreate this winning recipe ever again.
8. Psych
• If you ever just feel like having fun, but don’t want to leave your couch, then I’d recommend an episode of PSYCH. Although, in order to appreciate the show you need to have a fondness for obscure pop culture references and must not take your television too seriously.
The duo of Sean and Gus (James Roday and Dule Hill) do not represent anything truly unique on television. They owe Scrubs, Sherlock Holmes, House and Miami Vice (they’d want me to include that) for where they are today. That being said, these two buddies are the kind of guys you want to hang out with, and once a week you get to do that for an hour.
I think you’re able to have fun watching this show because of how much fun the cast is having making the show, as illustrated by the encore performances during the end credits, which usually include group songs.
Sure the mysteries are lacking and the action doesn’t compare to BURN NOTICE, but this is a comedy first and foremost. If you’re looking for anything else you’re just going to get psyched out. If you want to laugh, then get psyched for Psych
7. 30 Rock
• Not really sure what happened in season 3 of 30 Rock. I do know I laughed. That balance is why this show isn’t higher up on my charts. This was the funniest show on television, but without direction. I’m not saying that’s bad, I’m just saying that’s a deal breaker for a higher ranking.
Anyway, if you’ve never seen 30 Rock you’re doing yourself a disservice. It’s got a little bit of everything in terms of comedic styling. There is gross out humor of the lowest degree. There are high brow jokes (which people cite as the reason for not watching). Obscure references. Strange twists. And just jokes. All of this is jam packed into a 22-minute show so tightly that you’re amazed your television didn’t catch on fire when you’re done.
If you’re looking for funny, just head to 30 Rockefeller Plaza or catch it Thursday on NBC.
6. True Blood
•
If loving True Blood is wrong, then I don’t want to be right. The second season of True Blood would qualify as one of the craziest things ever on television. Its craziness was not off putting at all though, and instead drew me deeper and deeper into this make believe world.
Missing from this season was any semblance of reality, but it didn’t detract from the show.
The appeal of the show is it beauty and creativity. The world we see is presented to us in such a fashion that you struggle to take it all in. I’d say it is reminiscent of Deadwood or Mad Men in terms of the settings acting as additional players in a scene.
As far as the creativity, True Blood keeps you on your toes while sending you on a wild roller coaster ride. It’s scary. It’s fun. It’s got twists and turns. There are ups and downs. It is a ride.
Highlight: Jason and Andy taking matters into their own hands, as they prove that dumb is not just funny, but downright hilarious.
5. Battlestar Galactica
• The final installment of an amazing television series offered a worthy payout last spring. Much like True Blood, Battlestar was a wild ride. But more than True Blood, Battlestar offered deeper meanings.
By itself this season isn’t any more remarkable than earlier ones, in fact it might be comparatively weak. As the capstone to an amazing story it deserves to be recognized. In terms of a compelling narrative this is it. This story is delivered with an understated bang.
What is most memorable from this season is the shifting of allegiances, with the line between good and evil blurring to the point where the bad guys from the beginning of the series are revered as good guys.
4. Mad Men
• What’s so impressive about Mad Men is how close it comes to being unwatchable. The show is always in danger of putting me to sleep, and it would if it wasn’t executed so perfectly. Frankly, I’m not smart enough to adequately assess this show. I can only talk about it in terms of its entertainment value and the few concepts I was able to glean from it.
Many people wrote off the finale as an all too convenient ending, but I found it to be a perfect transition into the tumultuous part of the 60s.
As for entertainment, this season offered some heartbreaking moments (the firing of Sal), touching moments (the mood in the aftermath of JFK’s assassination) and light moments (Roger Sterling).
Season three began with a slow crescendo that was so faint and took so long to build that the ultimate payoff was out of this world. The patience of the show’s writers is admirable in this regard, even more so considering how there are no wasted moments building to the big payoff.
3. The Office
• Season 5 of The Office was the total package. It was endearing. It was funny. It was real. The show took from the best of its earlier seasons and brought it all together for the best season since its second. The fall off in season 6 has been even more evident in wake of such a good season.
In this season every character is used to perfection, with a place for everyone and everyone in their place. Andy hits his stride. The Jim and Pam dynamic is cemented. Even Michael, who has been a relatively fluid character, becomes a formed and constant role.
The deciding factor for me, is the story arc of Holly in this season. As played by Amy Ryan, there is an injection of heart into the show that I think is necessary for The Office to be great.
2. The Colbert Report
• Jon Stewart brought the Daily Show to prominence in 2000 during the recount in Florida following the presidential election. By 2004 the show was really hitting its stride and operated on all cylinders of funny. The 2008 election and the coverage of 2009 belonged to Stephen Colbert. Colbert offered a fresh perspective from the Daily Show, and with a few years under his belt, surpassed its creator in terms of funny during 2009.
Stephen Colbert’s year included a trip to Iraq, sponsoring a winter Olympic team and got a NASA treadmill named after him. It was all so ridiculous, but strikingly poignant in its coverage of the news. This last aspect is what sets the REPORT apart from the Daily Show, in that it doesn’t need to preach to make a point. Plus, it doesn’t sacrifice funny to preach.
1. Lost
• Lost will always win me over with the show’s mythology. Each episode could be a festering turd and I would still revere them, if they gave me a few answers each week. But Lost has never rested on its mythology, and has always given us our week to week bang. That combination puts it in my top ten automatically.
What differentiates this season from previous seasons is the scope of what they tried to pull off, and the fact that the show basically accomplishes it all with a homerun. What am I talking about? I’m talking about a storyline that crosses space and time. A story that requires on a giant ensemble cast. I’m talking about mythical creatures, ghost monsters and an island that moves. All of this is put together in a package that remains at its core, a human drama. A drama that inspired tears (spoiler alert: Juliet’s demise) and laughs (Hugo with anyone).
Season 5 had to wrap up most of the questions from seasons one through four while also poise us for the big finale in season 6. It does it. The story moves with a sense of urgency, but you never feel rushed. Even in the shortened load of episodes every story, ever character, every line of dialogue is given enough time to be appreciated.
Lost has constantly reinvented itself during its tenure, yet in season five we see a culmination of the different faces. This is our payoff before LOST reveals its true form in its final season.
The highlights are too numerous to limit, so I’ll just ramble them off: a domesticated Sawyer, Ben’s comedic styling, (spoiler alert) Daniel’s tragic end and the denied reunion between Sun and Jin.
.jpg)
So that’s my list of shows for 2009. I hope there’s something to talk about in there.
I am judging shows based on when they finished. This affects shows like Glee and Parks and Recreation, which will make the cut in 2010, but not this year. It’s the only fair way to judge a show’s complete arc, and not what it did during a brief period.
Hopefully this list will be inclusive enough for people, sine I watch almost everything. So here it is, in reverse order.
RIP: King of the Hill
• So this show isn’t making the Top Ten, but it does need to be recognized since it went off the air in 2009. HILL was maybe one of the best family sitcoms of all time. Following the life of the Hill family, this show had warmth and laughs.
Since it was a cartoon it was generally overlooked in terms of the quality of the writing and it was also ignored as a rip off of The Simpsons. These two realities will forever bother me.
HILL was never short on creative storylines, as the show did the best job finding the real humor in life. It didn’t rely solely on screwball characters or wacky plots, but was grounded in a reality we could all relate to. I tell you what, I will miss this show. Yup.
10. Chuck
• Odds are you’ve never seen or heard of Chuck, the little action/comedy that narrowly avoided execution after last year’s stellar season. The show revolves around an employee at a big box store called the BUY MORE, who has highly classified data stored in his head. This character, as portrayed by Zachary Levi, is one of the more endearing heroes on television. He is endearing because he is the everyman hero, and this allows us to be swept away on his adventures.
It helps that he has a wicked hot lady friend (Yvonne Strahovski) and a gruff protector (Adam Baldwin), who add laughs, sex appeal and a surprisingly high level of action scenes for a television show.
What ultimately ends up distinguishing this show from its competitors (I guess BURN NOTICE), is the supporting cast of characters that work at the BUY MORE. These guys and girls make the show a legit comedy, so when the action isn’t really working, the laughs are still coming.
Highlight: The penultimate episode includes a wedding in which everything goes wrong, but is just so right for the viewer.
9. Top Chef
• By any standard, this season of TOP CHEF was captivating television. Not much more to say about the show in the wake of my running diaries, which encapsulate the way I feel about this show.
This season had the right balance of talent, personalities and challenges that I doubt they’ll be able to recreate this winning recipe ever again.
8. Psych
• If you ever just feel like having fun, but don’t want to leave your couch, then I’d recommend an episode of PSYCH. Although, in order to appreciate the show you need to have a fondness for obscure pop culture references and must not take your television too seriously.
The duo of Sean and Gus (James Roday and Dule Hill) do not represent anything truly unique on television. They owe Scrubs, Sherlock Holmes, House and Miami Vice (they’d want me to include that) for where they are today. That being said, these two buddies are the kind of guys you want to hang out with, and once a week you get to do that for an hour.
I think you’re able to have fun watching this show because of how much fun the cast is having making the show, as illustrated by the encore performances during the end credits, which usually include group songs.
Sure the mysteries are lacking and the action doesn’t compare to BURN NOTICE, but this is a comedy first and foremost. If you’re looking for anything else you’re just going to get psyched out. If you want to laugh, then get psyched for Psych
7. 30 Rock
• Not really sure what happened in season 3 of 30 Rock. I do know I laughed. That balance is why this show isn’t higher up on my charts. This was the funniest show on television, but without direction. I’m not saying that’s bad, I’m just saying that’s a deal breaker for a higher ranking.
Anyway, if you’ve never seen 30 Rock you’re doing yourself a disservice. It’s got a little bit of everything in terms of comedic styling. There is gross out humor of the lowest degree. There are high brow jokes (which people cite as the reason for not watching). Obscure references. Strange twists. And just jokes. All of this is jam packed into a 22-minute show so tightly that you’re amazed your television didn’t catch on fire when you’re done.
If you’re looking for funny, just head to 30 Rockefeller Plaza or catch it Thursday on NBC.
6. True Blood
•
If loving True Blood is wrong, then I don’t want to be right. The second season of True Blood would qualify as one of the craziest things ever on television. Its craziness was not off putting at all though, and instead drew me deeper and deeper into this make believe world. Missing from this season was any semblance of reality, but it didn’t detract from the show.
The appeal of the show is it beauty and creativity. The world we see is presented to us in such a fashion that you struggle to take it all in. I’d say it is reminiscent of Deadwood or Mad Men in terms of the settings acting as additional players in a scene.
As far as the creativity, True Blood keeps you on your toes while sending you on a wild roller coaster ride. It’s scary. It’s fun. It’s got twists and turns. There are ups and downs. It is a ride.
Highlight: Jason and Andy taking matters into their own hands, as they prove that dumb is not just funny, but downright hilarious.
5. Battlestar Galactica
• The final installment of an amazing television series offered a worthy payout last spring. Much like True Blood, Battlestar was a wild ride. But more than True Blood, Battlestar offered deeper meanings.
By itself this season isn’t any more remarkable than earlier ones, in fact it might be comparatively weak. As the capstone to an amazing story it deserves to be recognized. In terms of a compelling narrative this is it. This story is delivered with an understated bang.
What is most memorable from this season is the shifting of allegiances, with the line between good and evil blurring to the point where the bad guys from the beginning of the series are revered as good guys.
4. Mad Men
• What’s so impressive about Mad Men is how close it comes to being unwatchable. The show is always in danger of putting me to sleep, and it would if it wasn’t executed so perfectly. Frankly, I’m not smart enough to adequately assess this show. I can only talk about it in terms of its entertainment value and the few concepts I was able to glean from it.
Many people wrote off the finale as an all too convenient ending, but I found it to be a perfect transition into the tumultuous part of the 60s.
As for entertainment, this season offered some heartbreaking moments (the firing of Sal), touching moments (the mood in the aftermath of JFK’s assassination) and light moments (Roger Sterling).
Season three began with a slow crescendo that was so faint and took so long to build that the ultimate payoff was out of this world. The patience of the show’s writers is admirable in this regard, even more so considering how there are no wasted moments building to the big payoff.
3. The Office
• Season 5 of The Office was the total package. It was endearing. It was funny. It was real. The show took from the best of its earlier seasons and brought it all together for the best season since its second. The fall off in season 6 has been even more evident in wake of such a good season.
In this season every character is used to perfection, with a place for everyone and everyone in their place. Andy hits his stride. The Jim and Pam dynamic is cemented. Even Michael, who has been a relatively fluid character, becomes a formed and constant role.
The deciding factor for me, is the story arc of Holly in this season. As played by Amy Ryan, there is an injection of heart into the show that I think is necessary for The Office to be great.
2. The Colbert Report
• Jon Stewart brought the Daily Show to prominence in 2000 during the recount in Florida following the presidential election. By 2004 the show was really hitting its stride and operated on all cylinders of funny. The 2008 election and the coverage of 2009 belonged to Stephen Colbert. Colbert offered a fresh perspective from the Daily Show, and with a few years under his belt, surpassed its creator in terms of funny during 2009.
Stephen Colbert’s year included a trip to Iraq, sponsoring a winter Olympic team and got a NASA treadmill named after him. It was all so ridiculous, but strikingly poignant in its coverage of the news. This last aspect is what sets the REPORT apart from the Daily Show, in that it doesn’t need to preach to make a point. Plus, it doesn’t sacrifice funny to preach.
1. Lost
• Lost will always win me over with the show’s mythology. Each episode could be a festering turd and I would still revere them, if they gave me a few answers each week. But Lost has never rested on its mythology, and has always given us our week to week bang. That combination puts it in my top ten automatically.
What differentiates this season from previous seasons is the scope of what they tried to pull off, and the fact that the show basically accomplishes it all with a homerun. What am I talking about? I’m talking about a storyline that crosses space and time. A story that requires on a giant ensemble cast. I’m talking about mythical creatures, ghost monsters and an island that moves. All of this is put together in a package that remains at its core, a human drama. A drama that inspired tears (spoiler alert: Juliet’s demise) and laughs (Hugo with anyone).
Season 5 had to wrap up most of the questions from seasons one through four while also poise us for the big finale in season 6. It does it. The story moves with a sense of urgency, but you never feel rushed. Even in the shortened load of episodes every story, ever character, every line of dialogue is given enough time to be appreciated.
Lost has constantly reinvented itself during its tenure, yet in season five we see a culmination of the different faces. This is our payoff before LOST reveals its true form in its final season.
The highlights are too numerous to limit, so I’ll just ramble them off: a domesticated Sawyer, Ben’s comedic styling, (spoiler alert) Daniel’s tragic end and the denied reunion between Sun and Jin.
.jpg)
So that’s my list of shows for 2009. I hope there’s something to talk about in there.
Elementary School Entertainment, My Dear Watson.
I like Guy Ritchie movies, even the bad ones. They’re normally fun. I’d go so far as to say they’re joyous romps. Joyous romps marred with blood, death, slow-mo action scenes and strange accents.
There is all of that in Guy Ritchie’s latest film, SHERLOCK HOLMES, except for the fun.
The movie tries to be fun. Unfortunately you’re left with banter reminiscent of HOUSE and a dynamic between Holmes and Watson that plays like Gus and Sean on PSYCH. Granted, both of those shows steal from the idea of Holmes, but this version of Holmes is essentially a bad rip off of other rip offs. If that sounds like a recipe for success then I’ve got a movie for you!
If not, then I’d encourage you to enter this movie well rested. Otherwise you’ll end up catching some zzz’s, like Alex and I did during the movie. I think I missed about 15 to 20 minutes during the middle, while he opted to ignore the last hour (Maybe he didn’t want a bad ending to spoil a great beginning).
Ritchie slams you in the face with this movie. Joke. Bang! Action scene. Bang! Joke! Wit! Action! Intrigue! Get it? Do you? Good. Because that’s what he’s going for. This movie has all the subtlety of a porn film, except when it comes to the mystery of the movie. The mystery and its resolution are of the Scooby Doo variety, in that no matter how well you paid attention, it was always some secret gas, mysterious chemical or groundskeeper that made it all possible.
As for the acting, I found that I really enjoyed Rachel McAdams. Playing something more than a damsel in distress, she doesn’t exactly steal the scenes she is in, but does contribute a lot. The same can be said about Jude Law, who is also a quality supporting actor.
The problem, dear brutus, lies with the star. Not that Downey Jr. is bad at Holmes. The problem is that he isn’t a star in the role. He is not a commanding presence. He is not Tony Stark. He is Kirk Lazarus (Tropic Thunder). A supporting actor. Except he needs to be the star here, and he doesn’t shine bright enough. Not for a movie of this size and scope.
So what you’re left with is a mediocre romp. It’s probably not as bad as I felt it was in the aftermath of the experience.
As far as reimaginings go this is no BATMAN BEGINS. Maybe the revenue will be enough to warrant a sequel. I don’t know. I’m more excited for a comedic take on Holmes. I think that’s what the world needed. Not a pithy version that we’ve already seen on television.
If you like explosions, go see this. If you like your laughs spoon fed to you, then go see this movie. If you like a movie to slap you in the face, steal your wallet and leave you feeling violated, then go see this movie.
I wish I had seen UP IN THE AIR.
There is all of that in Guy Ritchie’s latest film, SHERLOCK HOLMES, except for the fun.
The movie tries to be fun. Unfortunately you’re left with banter reminiscent of HOUSE and a dynamic between Holmes and Watson that plays like Gus and Sean on PSYCH. Granted, both of those shows steal from the idea of Holmes, but this version of Holmes is essentially a bad rip off of other rip offs. If that sounds like a recipe for success then I’ve got a movie for you!
If not, then I’d encourage you to enter this movie well rested. Otherwise you’ll end up catching some zzz’s, like Alex and I did during the movie. I think I missed about 15 to 20 minutes during the middle, while he opted to ignore the last hour (Maybe he didn’t want a bad ending to spoil a great beginning).
Ritchie slams you in the face with this movie. Joke. Bang! Action scene. Bang! Joke! Wit! Action! Intrigue! Get it? Do you? Good. Because that’s what he’s going for. This movie has all the subtlety of a porn film, except when it comes to the mystery of the movie. The mystery and its resolution are of the Scooby Doo variety, in that no matter how well you paid attention, it was always some secret gas, mysterious chemical or groundskeeper that made it all possible.
As for the acting, I found that I really enjoyed Rachel McAdams. Playing something more than a damsel in distress, she doesn’t exactly steal the scenes she is in, but does contribute a lot. The same can be said about Jude Law, who is also a quality supporting actor.
The problem, dear brutus, lies with the star. Not that Downey Jr. is bad at Holmes. The problem is that he isn’t a star in the role. He is not a commanding presence. He is not Tony Stark. He is Kirk Lazarus (Tropic Thunder). A supporting actor. Except he needs to be the star here, and he doesn’t shine bright enough. Not for a movie of this size and scope.
So what you’re left with is a mediocre romp. It’s probably not as bad as I felt it was in the aftermath of the experience.
As far as reimaginings go this is no BATMAN BEGINS. Maybe the revenue will be enough to warrant a sequel. I don’t know. I’m more excited for a comedic take on Holmes. I think that’s what the world needed. Not a pithy version that we’ve already seen on television.
If you like explosions, go see this. If you like your laughs spoon fed to you, then go see this movie. If you like a movie to slap you in the face, steal your wallet and leave you feeling violated, then go see this movie.
I wish I had seen UP IN THE AIR.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Trailers
Sex and the City 2: This movie didn't need to be made. The first one didn't need to be made. Ugh. Where the first movie remained grounded in some aspects of what made the show great (it was in NYC?), this movie appears to be running away from any semblance of wit and fun.
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi731841561/
Nine: Boy this movie looks hot. It's like CHICAGO meets the PUSSYCAT DOLLS, but in a good way. I'm excited for this movie, to the point where I might even see it in theaters. Even Kate Hudson doesn't look awful.
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3483436057/
Hot Tub Time Machine: At least it's a creative idea for a movie. Can you guess what it's about? Yeah, it's about philosophers Locke and Hobbes. Kidding. Honestly, though, this looks like fun. Essentially a homeless man's version of THE HANGOVER, with more stupid culture references.
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi1318257689/
Shrek (I'm Green and I want more Green): So that's not the real title of this movie, but it might as well be. At this point in his life I don't think Mike Myers has a soul. He has made a sequel to wayne's world, two (and maybe three) to austin powers and now a fourth Shrek movie!!! UGh. The trailer looks bad. Basically I feel like they ran out of ideas so they'll do the first movie again, but in a different universe.
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi2962621465/
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi731841561/
Nine: Boy this movie looks hot. It's like CHICAGO meets the PUSSYCAT DOLLS, but in a good way. I'm excited for this movie, to the point where I might even see it in theaters. Even Kate Hudson doesn't look awful.
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3483436057/
Hot Tub Time Machine: At least it's a creative idea for a movie. Can you guess what it's about? Yeah, it's about philosophers Locke and Hobbes. Kidding. Honestly, though, this looks like fun. Essentially a homeless man's version of THE HANGOVER, with more stupid culture references.
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi1318257689/
Shrek (I'm Green and I want more Green): So that's not the real title of this movie, but it might as well be. At this point in his life I don't think Mike Myers has a soul. He has made a sequel to wayne's world, two (and maybe three) to austin powers and now a fourth Shrek movie!!! UGh. The trailer looks bad. Basically I feel like they ran out of ideas so they'll do the first movie again, but in a different universe.
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi2962621465/
District 9: MUST SEE!
On a related note, I will never see AVATAR in theaters. Visual effects are great, as long as they're only the for the purpose of augmenting a strong story. Well, according to Joe the story in Avatar sucks (Joe is my brother). His opinion gains even more oomph when you consider it in conjunction with the poor reviews the movie has gotten and actually watch the awful clips that have been released.
I won't just skip Avatar. Rather, I'll resent Avatar for stealing the spotlight from other "revolutionary" movies, such as District 9. Ever heard of it? Maybe? If you had, your perception of it is probably similar to Alex's when he referred to it, which is that District 9 was a Transformers rip off. After seeing the movie, Alex isn't saying that anymore.
In fact, Alex is raving about the movie. THat's high praise from a guy who usually sticks to comedies and has no problem just sleeping through movies that don't hold his attention.
Hopefully that recommendation will be enough to motivate you to view this movie. If not, I will also offer some disjointed thoughts about DISTRICT 9.
District 9 is filmed in the documentary style that has become all the rage lately. The movie works this element seamlessly, utilizing the effect at the beginning and end to set the scene and offer closure. It also adds a layer of realism to a film that becomes shockingly plausible.
The plot of the movie is relatively simple. In a world where aliens live in a refugee settlement in South Africa, one low level administrator gets an infection that begins turning him into one of the aliens. What then happens is a morality story, layered with references to apartheid and a critique of corporate greed. You end up getting a high-end trippy film with stunning visual aspects and a constant flow of surprises.
The film's star was completely unknown before this movie, with his only other credit being a sniper role in some movie. Now the guy will be in the upcoming A-Team movie. His name is Sharlto Copley and he is simply awesome. His character undergoes a transformation that is shocking when you consider his demeanor from start to finish. This is obvious since he goes from mindless drone in this movie to big time action star in the A-Team.
I don't want to say more about the movie because uncovering the plot is half the fun. This movie really is an event. It's a ride. Honestly, find a nice big tv and some friends to watch this movie with, and you won't be disappointed.
I won't just skip Avatar. Rather, I'll resent Avatar for stealing the spotlight from other "revolutionary" movies, such as District 9. Ever heard of it? Maybe? If you had, your perception of it is probably similar to Alex's when he referred to it, which is that District 9 was a Transformers rip off. After seeing the movie, Alex isn't saying that anymore.
In fact, Alex is raving about the movie. THat's high praise from a guy who usually sticks to comedies and has no problem just sleeping through movies that don't hold his attention.
Hopefully that recommendation will be enough to motivate you to view this movie. If not, I will also offer some disjointed thoughts about DISTRICT 9.
District 9 is filmed in the documentary style that has become all the rage lately. The movie works this element seamlessly, utilizing the effect at the beginning and end to set the scene and offer closure. It also adds a layer of realism to a film that becomes shockingly plausible.
The plot of the movie is relatively simple. In a world where aliens live in a refugee settlement in South Africa, one low level administrator gets an infection that begins turning him into one of the aliens. What then happens is a morality story, layered with references to apartheid and a critique of corporate greed. You end up getting a high-end trippy film with stunning visual aspects and a constant flow of surprises.
The film's star was completely unknown before this movie, with his only other credit being a sniper role in some movie. Now the guy will be in the upcoming A-Team movie. His name is Sharlto Copley and he is simply awesome. His character undergoes a transformation that is shocking when you consider his demeanor from start to finish. This is obvious since he goes from mindless drone in this movie to big time action star in the A-Team.
I don't want to say more about the movie because uncovering the plot is half the fun. This movie really is an event. It's a ride. Honestly, find a nice big tv and some friends to watch this movie with, and you won't be disappointed.
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
The Apprentice: Summer Camp Edition
Author's Note: (A version of this column will never run in the paper, because my editor/mom says it will get me fired from the job that is referenced. Well, I waited until that job was over and then she said it would keep me from working for them again. I don't want to work there again. Plus it's not that big of a deal. Here it is...)
On Monday, November 30th I was flown to Philadelphia (via Cleveland to build character) for training on how to promote the new Windows smart phones at malls in the Northeast during the holiday shopping season. It wasn’t long into this experience, specifically during our first team exercise that I realized I was involved in the first installment of The Apprentice: Summer Camp Edition.
I should have caught on immediately when I noticed the “bug juice” on the table for dinner, but it wasn’t until I heard the dinner conversations that I realized everyone was reconnecting like the first day of summer camp. While none of the campers knew each other, they immediately fell into a familiar pitter patter about promotions and products that dripped off their tongues and was a foreign language to me.
The Apprentice dynamic emerged the next day we were assigned the task of creating thirty second commercials for the phones. During brainstorming everyone began to carve out their niche, whether it was obnoxious blowhard, take charge leader, reserved standout or silent drift wood. In lieu of Ivanka Trump assessing our progress we were monitored by a less famous, but equally untalented babe spouting similar canned clichés.
The result of the challenge was three recycled ideas, with yours truly ripping off John Hodgeman’s PC persona. Ultimately all three groups were declared winners. This was the Summer Camp part of the event, because we were fostering an environment that only exists in the lives of small children.
While familiarizing ourselves with the products we were assured they were cutting edge and top of their class. It could have imagined Donald Trump declaring that these were, “the classiest, greatest, most amazing classy phones. Pharaohs wanted them and god used them to drunk dial the pope.” Eventually it became clear that like a camp craft project we were just killing time, and it didn’t matter what our lanyards looked like or if we could use the phone.
It wasn’t all fun and games, as we received the first of a series of warnings detailing how perilous are pursuit was. Unfortunately the corporate VP who spoke to us was less like Trump’s right hand woman Carol, and more like a restrained version of Alec Baldwin’s character in Glengarry Glen Ross. She rallied our spirits while impressing upon us the severity of our task. It was hard to take seriously, though, since she didn’t drop the bomb about third prize. What does third prize get? You’re fired.
If only. If only that was the case I might have taken this all a little more serious. Unfortunately I got caught up in the summer camp aspect of the gathering and decided to be the apathetic contestant more commonly found on Celebrity Apprentice. I chose to play solitaire on the phone, talk politics and generally avoided thinking about windows as a silent protest against the fact our conference room had none. Luckily you can only get sent home from camp if you’re ill or homesick.
On our final day we began working towards our big end of camp skit. We would be role playing a customer interaction from start to finish.
It was during our rehearsals that I realized this training had actual consequences, which differentiated from the made up job a winner gets on The Apprentice, and I began to take it seriously. I threw myself into the process, with my efforts paying off in a big way when my partner and I were chosen to deliver the full presentation as a culmination to the training.
We nailed it. As the promoter of the phone I tied in all the tenets we had been taught and successfully got a fictional person interested in the phone.
Unfortunately the real challenge still lay ahead with the actual field work. I knew this was when things could become tumultuous, as we left the safe confines of summer camp and embarked on The Apprentice: Road Trip Edition.
On Monday, November 30th I was flown to Philadelphia (via Cleveland to build character) for training on how to promote the new Windows smart phones at malls in the Northeast during the holiday shopping season. It wasn’t long into this experience, specifically during our first team exercise that I realized I was involved in the first installment of The Apprentice: Summer Camp Edition.
I should have caught on immediately when I noticed the “bug juice” on the table for dinner, but it wasn’t until I heard the dinner conversations that I realized everyone was reconnecting like the first day of summer camp. While none of the campers knew each other, they immediately fell into a familiar pitter patter about promotions and products that dripped off their tongues and was a foreign language to me.
The Apprentice dynamic emerged the next day we were assigned the task of creating thirty second commercials for the phones. During brainstorming everyone began to carve out their niche, whether it was obnoxious blowhard, take charge leader, reserved standout or silent drift wood. In lieu of Ivanka Trump assessing our progress we were monitored by a less famous, but equally untalented babe spouting similar canned clichés.
The result of the challenge was three recycled ideas, with yours truly ripping off John Hodgeman’s PC persona. Ultimately all three groups were declared winners. This was the Summer Camp part of the event, because we were fostering an environment that only exists in the lives of small children.
While familiarizing ourselves with the products we were assured they were cutting edge and top of their class. It could have imagined Donald Trump declaring that these were, “the classiest, greatest, most amazing classy phones. Pharaohs wanted them and god used them to drunk dial the pope.” Eventually it became clear that like a camp craft project we were just killing time, and it didn’t matter what our lanyards looked like or if we could use the phone.
It wasn’t all fun and games, as we received the first of a series of warnings detailing how perilous are pursuit was. Unfortunately the corporate VP who spoke to us was less like Trump’s right hand woman Carol, and more like a restrained version of Alec Baldwin’s character in Glengarry Glen Ross. She rallied our spirits while impressing upon us the severity of our task. It was hard to take seriously, though, since she didn’t drop the bomb about third prize. What does third prize get? You’re fired.
If only. If only that was the case I might have taken this all a little more serious. Unfortunately I got caught up in the summer camp aspect of the gathering and decided to be the apathetic contestant more commonly found on Celebrity Apprentice. I chose to play solitaire on the phone, talk politics and generally avoided thinking about windows as a silent protest against the fact our conference room had none. Luckily you can only get sent home from camp if you’re ill or homesick.
On our final day we began working towards our big end of camp skit. We would be role playing a customer interaction from start to finish.
It was during our rehearsals that I realized this training had actual consequences, which differentiated from the made up job a winner gets on The Apprentice, and I began to take it seriously. I threw myself into the process, with my efforts paying off in a big way when my partner and I were chosen to deliver the full presentation as a culmination to the training.
We nailed it. As the promoter of the phone I tied in all the tenets we had been taught and successfully got a fictional person interested in the phone.
Unfortunately the real challenge still lay ahead with the actual field work. I knew this was when things could become tumultuous, as we left the safe confines of summer camp and embarked on The Apprentice: Road Trip Edition.
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Jersey Shore: It must be love
In the pantheon of reality television I can confidently say that after 2.25 episodes, Jersey Shore is one of my two favorite reality shows of all time. In fairness to other reality shows, I probably have never seen you. I’m aware of Survivor, Amazing Race, Big Brother and Dancing with the Stars, but they’re not interesting to me. There is nothing compelling about them.
My favorite reality show is Top Chef. It combines interesting plots, characters and cooking. That’s a good recipe for me.
But Jersey Shore is the human experiment of my life. Sure, these people are hilarious on the surface. But that’s just one aspect of the show. The hair, the language the superficial stuff is just one layer. Beneath the surface we see that they’re just like everyone else. It’s just a different package. I love it.
Additionally, ANgelina's boyfriend is a complete wet blanket. Normally this role is acted out by the woman, but he owns the role. He completes the picture by being insecure (worries about what she's doing) and he's awkward in her environment (isn't really around the whole house). He predicts things will go badly during his visit, which couldn't be more accurate. They aren't clicking in this atmosphere and it will blow up in their face. Oh yeah, I'm prematurely writing this since I'm so excited. Also, I'm typically the wet blanket. But I know I am, so I find ways to avoid being the wet blanket. It's a constant struggle.
But wait, my premature declaration has blown up in my face!!!! UGh, i need to shower. ANgelina's boyfriend is married? She's someone's mistress. Must contain my thoughts.
My favorite reality show is Top Chef. It combines interesting plots, characters and cooking. That’s a good recipe for me.
But Jersey Shore is the human experiment of my life. Sure, these people are hilarious on the surface. But that’s just one aspect of the show. The hair, the language the superficial stuff is just one layer. Beneath the surface we see that they’re just like everyone else. It’s just a different package. I love it.
Additionally, ANgelina's boyfriend is a complete wet blanket. Normally this role is acted out by the woman, but he owns the role. He completes the picture by being insecure (worries about what she's doing) and he's awkward in her environment (isn't really around the whole house). He predicts things will go badly during his visit, which couldn't be more accurate. They aren't clicking in this atmosphere and it will blow up in their face. Oh yeah, I'm prematurely writing this since I'm so excited. Also, I'm typically the wet blanket. But I know I am, so I find ways to avoid being the wet blanket. It's a constant struggle.
But wait, my premature declaration has blown up in my face!!!! UGh, i need to shower. ANgelina's boyfriend is married? She's someone's mistress. Must contain my thoughts.
The Office is work
I don't think it is a good sign that watching THE OFFICE now feels like work for me. I've put off watching Thursday's episode for two days now, since I had my first chance to watch it Monday morning.
MY recap of Thursday TV is usually something like this: 30 Rock, Parks, Community, The OFfice and then Fringe. This week I skipped The Office.
If you're wondering, I watch Always Sunny and The League at random points in my life online. Not sure why, and it really has nothing to do with how much i like them. Especially since I hate the League and love Sunny.
But back to THE OFFICE, which hasn't been particularly bad this season. I think the problem for me revolves around the fact that its not a simple running joke anymore. It seems like real life, and tv is about escaping reality.
The reality aspects come into play in terms of Jim's role in the company, which seems rather futile at this point. In his new capacity as co-manager he's not exactly flourishing.
Ok, that doesn't sound like what I want to say. THe reason is because I don't really mean it. I'm beating around the bush, because I don't want to give in. I don't want to admit, that THE OFFICE HASN"T BEEN FUNNY LATELY.
There, I said it.
It hasn't been without laughs, but PARKS AND RECREATIONS has passed it in terms of enjoyable experience. THE OFFICE is still a better show, but like i said, it feels work. Having to digest a real meal, when i just want something light and fluffy is hard.
Maybe it's the consequences of the show. The company could be going under, and that's depressing.
The show definitely has its moments. But they're more like cute moments, such as Erin and Michael bonding in the car after the failure with Scott's Tots.
The scene elicited a smile, but not a laugh. My heart was touched, but not my funny bone. So eh.
The show needs to grab me by escaping with me. Let go of reality and go back to the quirks of Office life that people can relate to without wanting to slit their wrists.
Give us more Kevin. Andy should be courting Erin more efficiently. How about Holly? If not Holly, how about some Jan?
Basically, if the open is the funniest thing about the show then something is wrong.
The Office needs to get back to work and prove that at this point in its career it still has something left in the tank. I was defending this show vigorously online and in private conversations, but I don't know how much longer I can fight without ammunition.
MY recap of Thursday TV is usually something like this: 30 Rock, Parks, Community, The OFfice and then Fringe. This week I skipped The Office.
If you're wondering, I watch Always Sunny and The League at random points in my life online. Not sure why, and it really has nothing to do with how much i like them. Especially since I hate the League and love Sunny.
But back to THE OFFICE, which hasn't been particularly bad this season. I think the problem for me revolves around the fact that its not a simple running joke anymore. It seems like real life, and tv is about escaping reality.
The reality aspects come into play in terms of Jim's role in the company, which seems rather futile at this point. In his new capacity as co-manager he's not exactly flourishing.
Ok, that doesn't sound like what I want to say. THe reason is because I don't really mean it. I'm beating around the bush, because I don't want to give in. I don't want to admit, that THE OFFICE HASN"T BEEN FUNNY LATELY.
There, I said it.
It hasn't been without laughs, but PARKS AND RECREATIONS has passed it in terms of enjoyable experience. THE OFFICE is still a better show, but like i said, it feels work. Having to digest a real meal, when i just want something light and fluffy is hard.
Maybe it's the consequences of the show. The company could be going under, and that's depressing.
The show definitely has its moments. But they're more like cute moments, such as Erin and Michael bonding in the car after the failure with Scott's Tots.
The scene elicited a smile, but not a laugh. My heart was touched, but not my funny bone. So eh.The show needs to grab me by escaping with me. Let go of reality and go back to the quirks of Office life that people can relate to without wanting to slit their wrists.
Give us more Kevin. Andy should be courting Erin more efficiently. How about Holly? If not Holly, how about some Jan?
Basically, if the open is the funniest thing about the show then something is wrong.
The Office needs to get back to work and prove that at this point in its career it still has something left in the tank. I was defending this show vigorously online and in private conversations, but I don't know how much longer I can fight without ammunition.
Enough with Jennifer Hudson
Maybe I'll sound like an idiot, but I just want people to know for sure that I really am. Now that you know that about me, I think you should also know that I can't stand Jennifer Hudson.
My hatred for her goes way back to when she was on American Idol. To this day, that remains to be the only season I've only watched. It started when my friend Rick commented that I was on the show in the form of red head John Stevens. Stevens sang old songs, which was what reminded Rick of me. Well, I'm so sick that I began watching and living through John...
Anyway, Hudson was knocked off a week before Stevens and everyone made a stink about what a travesty that was. So what if she had a better voice? He had better hair. So what if it was a singing competition? He was more popular. Just because he should have been voted off doesn't mean I need to feel bad for Hudson. In fact, I began to resent her because she generated a lot of resentment towards my boy. (I have his debut cd).
Then she was in Dream Girls, which was ok I guess. Don't really think it was better than THE TEMPTATIONS movie from the late 90s, but I guess that's just a matter of choice. I did not think Hudson was great in the movie. She was up against a bunch of nobodies and Cate Blanchett, for her Oscar and all the buzz meant Hudson was getting it.
First of all, Blanchett always deserves to win. She could have done Hudson's role. I'm sure of it. Second, I don't think Hollywood should glamorize fat people. Besides the fact that I'd rather look at Beyonce, I really mean that i don't think she's overcoming any major obstacles in her life by being fat. You can lose weight.
Also, I'm not overly impressed with her voice. Wow! She hits the big notes. She goes for it when she sings. Leaves everything on the stage. Um no. She's no better than Jennifer Hudson-lite on GLEE, who even sang the big DREAM GIRLS song on GLEE. Was there a difference? No, except that the teen didn't get an award and she's probably a better actor.
Finally, and most damning in my opinion, was Hudson's role as Louise in the Sex and the City movie. I hate this movie. I hate it so much. Even if Hudson was great in the movie I would have not liked her. Well she wasn't great. She was annoying. I wanted to poison the next handbag she got in the mail. She just rubbed me the wrong way. If you wanted more of an articulate argument, then you're reading the wrong blog.
By the way, all of this stems from a picture I saw of her on the AOL Today page. No idea what it was in reference to, but I can only hope that she has announced her retirement.
Beyonce is a better singer/actor (Single Ladies/Austin Powers: GOld Member). That's why she gets her picture in, and Jennifer Hudson is absent from this post.
My hatred for her goes way back to when she was on American Idol. To this day, that remains to be the only season I've only watched. It started when my friend Rick commented that I was on the show in the form of red head John Stevens. Stevens sang old songs, which was what reminded Rick of me. Well, I'm so sick that I began watching and living through John...
Anyway, Hudson was knocked off a week before Stevens and everyone made a stink about what a travesty that was. So what if she had a better voice? He had better hair. So what if it was a singing competition? He was more popular. Just because he should have been voted off doesn't mean I need to feel bad for Hudson. In fact, I began to resent her because she generated a lot of resentment towards my boy. (I have his debut cd).
Then she was in Dream Girls, which was ok I guess. Don't really think it was better than THE TEMPTATIONS movie from the late 90s, but I guess that's just a matter of choice. I did not think Hudson was great in the movie. She was up against a bunch of nobodies and Cate Blanchett, for her Oscar and all the buzz meant Hudson was getting it.
First of all, Blanchett always deserves to win. She could have done Hudson's role. I'm sure of it. Second, I don't think Hollywood should glamorize fat people. Besides the fact that I'd rather look at Beyonce, I really mean that i don't think she's overcoming any major obstacles in her life by being fat. You can lose weight.
Also, I'm not overly impressed with her voice. Wow! She hits the big notes. She goes for it when she sings. Leaves everything on the stage. Um no. She's no better than Jennifer Hudson-lite on GLEE, who even sang the big DREAM GIRLS song on GLEE. Was there a difference? No, except that the teen didn't get an award and she's probably a better actor.
Finally, and most damning in my opinion, was Hudson's role as Louise in the Sex and the City movie. I hate this movie. I hate it so much. Even if Hudson was great in the movie I would have not liked her. Well she wasn't great. She was annoying. I wanted to poison the next handbag she got in the mail. She just rubbed me the wrong way. If you wanted more of an articulate argument, then you're reading the wrong blog.
By the way, all of this stems from a picture I saw of her on the AOL Today page. No idea what it was in reference to, but I can only hope that she has announced her retirement.
Beyonce is a better singer/actor (Single Ladies/Austin Powers: GOld Member). That's why she gets her picture in, and Jennifer Hudson is absent from this post.
Cloudy in Philadelphia
I just finished the last two episode of ALWAYS SUNNY IN PHILADELPHIA, which signified a whimpering end to the 5th season. By a whimper I mean compared to a bang. And this season was filled with bangs, as exemplified by the failed road trip out of Philadelphia.
The penultimate episode revolved around the film of a movie in Philadelphia. The storyline with Mac and Dennis gets the most laughs, in its insanity and the way they're mocking the movie making process. I think i liked the underlying commentary better than anything else. The supposed twists in the episode didn't really deliver any laughs. Dennis failed to amuse me or surprise me. Dee was Dee, which isn't really good or bad, as she's typically just a foil for the other characters. As for Frank, I thought he nailed his role just by eating a breakfast sausage out of his breast pocket.
I think my main problem with this episode stemmed from the fact that it felt like a repeat. THe episode felt like something I'd already seen in new packaging. I understand that every episode is about how horrible they are and how futile their lives are, but each episode needs to bring something new. This episode felt like nothing new.
There were definitely shades of SUNNY brilliance in the episode, but they were fleeting. Dee trying to get into the trailer was classic. Unfortunately her self-destruction was predictable. Mac and Charlie brainstorming is always giggle worthy. Actually they remained at a high level of excellence. Ultimately it comes down to Dennis remaining out of the limelight until the end, when he is supposed to steal the show. It ultimately fell flat.
The finale, which brings the gang to college was also a disappointment. Alex loved the episode and talked it up to the point where I had to see it tonight. Unfortunately I disagree with assessment of the episode. I think I actually enjoyed his recounting of the story better than the actual episode. When he told me about Charlie doing Will Hunting I laughed more than when Charlie executed the character.
For me the episode packs too much into such a short span. That's good in a show where plot doesn't matter, like 30 Rock where it's just a series of running jokes, but SUNNY offers good story with interesting plot points. All of that gets lost when you're running through a show on hyperspeed.
Essentially the show could have been split in two. Do the college episode as its own show, and they had a perfect lead with Frank wearing his tight pants. This aspect never gets mentioned, not really, after the opening, but it could have made the rest of the gang seize their youth. This would have led them back to college. Plus, I think Charlie should have done Will Hunting without announcing it. THen maybe ending the episode by showing he's really retarded. I find that more interesting, and I think it would have given Flipadelphia the attention it deserved in another episode.
I mean c'mon, FLIPADELHPHIA!?!?! That's flipping fantastic. I'd watch that episode. Maybe bring back the Korean bar. Have the waitress compete. And rickety cricket, we'd need him.
But no. Instead the show went out with a pffffff, instead of with the bang it deserved. I'm disappointed. I don't feel betrayed, but after a history of big ballsy finales this one didn't stand up.
The penultimate episode revolved around the film of a movie in Philadelphia. The storyline with Mac and Dennis gets the most laughs, in its insanity and the way they're mocking the movie making process. I think i liked the underlying commentary better than anything else. The supposed twists in the episode didn't really deliver any laughs. Dennis failed to amuse me or surprise me. Dee was Dee, which isn't really good or bad, as she's typically just a foil for the other characters. As for Frank, I thought he nailed his role just by eating a breakfast sausage out of his breast pocket.
I think my main problem with this episode stemmed from the fact that it felt like a repeat. THe episode felt like something I'd already seen in new packaging. I understand that every episode is about how horrible they are and how futile their lives are, but each episode needs to bring something new. This episode felt like nothing new.
There were definitely shades of SUNNY brilliance in the episode, but they were fleeting. Dee trying to get into the trailer was classic. Unfortunately her self-destruction was predictable. Mac and Charlie brainstorming is always giggle worthy. Actually they remained at a high level of excellence. Ultimately it comes down to Dennis remaining out of the limelight until the end, when he is supposed to steal the show. It ultimately fell flat.
The finale, which brings the gang to college was also a disappointment. Alex loved the episode and talked it up to the point where I had to see it tonight. Unfortunately I disagree with assessment of the episode. I think I actually enjoyed his recounting of the story better than the actual episode. When he told me about Charlie doing Will Hunting I laughed more than when Charlie executed the character.
For me the episode packs too much into such a short span. That's good in a show where plot doesn't matter, like 30 Rock where it's just a series of running jokes, but SUNNY offers good story with interesting plot points. All of that gets lost when you're running through a show on hyperspeed.
Essentially the show could have been split in two. Do the college episode as its own show, and they had a perfect lead with Frank wearing his tight pants. This aspect never gets mentioned, not really, after the opening, but it could have made the rest of the gang seize their youth. This would have led them back to college. Plus, I think Charlie should have done Will Hunting without announcing it. THen maybe ending the episode by showing he's really retarded. I find that more interesting, and I think it would have given Flipadelphia the attention it deserved in another episode.
I mean c'mon, FLIPADELHPHIA!?!?! That's flipping fantastic. I'd watch that episode. Maybe bring back the Korean bar. Have the waitress compete. And rickety cricket, we'd need him.
But no. Instead the show went out with a pffffff, instead of with the bang it deserved. I'm disappointed. I don't feel betrayed, but after a history of big ballsy finales this one didn't stand up.
Monday, December 14, 2009
Top Chef Tonight
On Thursday's episode of THE TONIGHT SHOW with CONAN O'BRIEN the second guest was this season's TOP CHEF winner, Michael V. This just seems like a terrible idea to me, except form the standpoint that BRAVO and NBC are sister companies.
It's a bad idea because of Mike's personality, which is uber-serious. He takes himself serious. He takes his profession serious. He auditioned for a role in the Cohen brothers, A SERIOUS MAN.
Normally I'd say that Conan could just mock the way Mike carries himself, like he does of show producer Jordan. THe difference is that Jordan has no interest in being the star, which is completely contrary to Mike. I knew coming in that Mike would try to be funny, or worse, take the experience super serious.
Bryan on the other hand would have been perfect fodder for Conan. His droll demeanor would have been a perfect foil for Conan, especially since he seems to be able to take a joke. This is in sharp contrast to Mike, who I could see walking off the set.
The most striking thing about Mike's appearance was how short he was compared to Conan. I had no idea that he was this short. That means Kevin is really about 5 foot 3 and Eli fits comfortable in most oversized luggage.
The performance wasn't as terrible as it could have been, with Mike scoring, in my book at least, with a joke about premature ejaculation. I do need to give him credit for not being himself and only making the experience somewhat uncomfortable.
It's a bad idea because of Mike's personality, which is uber-serious. He takes himself serious. He takes his profession serious. He auditioned for a role in the Cohen brothers, A SERIOUS MAN.
Normally I'd say that Conan could just mock the way Mike carries himself, like he does of show producer Jordan. THe difference is that Jordan has no interest in being the star, which is completely contrary to Mike. I knew coming in that Mike would try to be funny, or worse, take the experience super serious.
Bryan on the other hand would have been perfect fodder for Conan. His droll demeanor would have been a perfect foil for Conan, especially since he seems to be able to take a joke. This is in sharp contrast to Mike, who I could see walking off the set.
The most striking thing about Mike's appearance was how short he was compared to Conan. I had no idea that he was this short. That means Kevin is really about 5 foot 3 and Eli fits comfortable in most oversized luggage.
The performance wasn't as terrible as it could have been, with Mike scoring, in my book at least, with a joke about premature ejaculation. I do need to give him credit for not being himself and only making the experience somewhat uncomfortable.
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Feedback Please
Because I want to please my readers, I mean reader, Hey Steve, I thought I would inquire into what you wanted to see.
Do you like the direction of the blog? Would you like more reviews? Longer reviews? Shorter reviews?
Should i be doing more movies, books or music?
Or do you just not care?
Do you want more Alex? (That's him sleeping).
Do you like the direction of the blog? Would you like more reviews? Longer reviews? Shorter reviews?
Should i be doing more movies, books or music?
Or do you just not care?
Do you want more Alex? (That's him sleeping).
Great Reveal on Lost
I think one of the best reveals on Lost is when we learn that Sun made it off the island, while Jin's fate is doubtful. I was literally crying the first time I saw this episode. (I may be a girl who just happens to have a penis).
Yet the reveal is misleading, since (spoiler alert) Jin is ok. Although, they currently have not reconnected. This episode began a long tease about their relationship that is still going on.
It could have ended perfectly, with Jin dying on the boat as he saves Sun, like he promised. Instead he gets a pardon from the Lost gods (seems like a pun). It just didn't do it for me. I get that Jin is a beloved character, but he could have been sacrificed just the way Charlie was.
Charlie made a sacrifice and Jin should have gone down the same path. To not do this is a failure by the writers, unless of course Jin has an amazing story in the final season.
This episode also introduces us to Kevin Johnson, which is Michael's alias on the boat. Up next is the episode detailing the life of Kevin Johnson.
Yet the reveal is misleading, since (spoiler alert) Jin is ok. Although, they currently have not reconnected. This episode began a long tease about their relationship that is still going on.
It could have ended perfectly, with Jin dying on the boat as he saves Sun, like he promised. Instead he gets a pardon from the Lost gods (seems like a pun). It just didn't do it for me. I get that Jin is a beloved character, but he could have been sacrificed just the way Charlie was.
Charlie made a sacrifice and Jin should have gone down the same path. To not do this is a failure by the writers, unless of course Jin has an amazing story in the final season.
This episode also introduces us to Kevin Johnson, which is Michael's alias on the boat. Up next is the episode detailing the life of Kevin Johnson.
Gladware Champion
It all comes down to tonight’s final challenge between the three finalists on TOP Chef. I’m rooting hard for Bryan, who I picked to win after the first episode. I won’t be devastated if he loses, but I’ll be heartbroken if I have to watch him lose to his brother and experience that shame.
Without further delay let’s get on with the show…
• There were “a lot of bad ass cooks,” Eli. I think this season will stand out, at least in my mind, as the one with the deepest cast of contestants. There were five potential winners, and a whole host of other qualified candidates that could throw their weight around with the big dogs. Although my comparison is only based on watching two seasons of Top Chef, so I might not be the authority on this issue.
•
I like the challenge of the first course, where all three chefs have the same ingredients. This gives Michael a chance to backup his claim that Kevin’s food is too simple, since he can really outshine him here. Or it could blow up in his face, if Kevin is able to deliver better flavor with the same ingredients. Bryan will just be Bryan. Speaking of which, I think his brother has a higher ceiling, but Bryan remains at a high level of excellence and avoids the valleys.
• Love Michael trying to come up with something nice to say about his helper. I wonder how many takes it took him before he finally arrived at his backhanded compliment. Bryan, on the other hand, basically drooled about working with Jen. Kevin got a wild card, and I’m interested in seeing how Preeti (that might be right) works out. The distribution this way is not fair. I don’t think it necessarily proves who is the Top Chef.
• In the second round of knife drawing Kevin got hosed again and Bryan picked up another winner. Ash is a good follower, which is ok for Kevin, but Bryan got someone super creative in Ashely. (Did I mention my crush on Ashley?). As for Eli going to Mike, I think he’s just happy he didn’t get Robin. Eli is good, but it doesn’t really matter since Mike is going to be so hand’s on. I can’t imagine him delegating too much authority.
• Kevin says he’s getting mad, and I’m worried how that will manifest itself. We could have our first Top Chef murder.
• Love the fact that the chefs expect a curveball. And they get one, in that they get a curveball by not getting a cuveball. Did that make sense? I have trouble with baseball analogies. Knuckleball?
• Mrs. V has some wild eyes! Curveball! Kevin’s mom is obviously Kevin’s mom. Although I wouldn’t have been surprised if she had a beard too. Fastball!
• I feel like some of the Top Chef contestants would make for good television personalities with their own cooking shows. Southern home cooking with Kevin. Creative creations with Mike.
• Here comes a curveball with Tom! Oh, and he hung the ball over the plate with a challenge that isn’t really too hard. Can’t tell if Mike is being genuine about his childhood memories, but if he is then he is winning points in my book. Almost explains why he has this tough outer shell. What an aww moment, and with the most unlikely person.
• I need to give props to Mike again, this time regarding how well thought out his dishes are. This guy is playing to win, and is demonstrating a real strategy.
• Kevin sounds like he planned his dessert with Jim Gaffigan in mind. If you don’t know, that’s a reference to their shared love of bacon. If he really wanted to please Jim he’s make a hot pocket with bacon in it
• Bryan wins. That’s it. Kevin didn’t blow them away with any ideas or execution. Mike’s performance was marred by the low lows. I think Bryan will win.
• “I was the underdog that showed if you fight really hard you can make it, and it just didn’t go all the way.” Love the sentiment Kevin, even if it contradicts itself.
• Damn! I just paused it as Padma said Michael. He won. They’re trying to throw us another one of those curveballs, except we know it is coming. I hope I’m wrong. But I’m not.
• There it is. BOOOOOOOO. BOOOOOOOOOOO. (Ok, he deserved it)
• Wow, this is actually touching. The mom hugging the two boys. The music. Gail. Oh sweet Gail. Tobey even looks choked up. Love that Mike gives a shout out to Padma about emotion. Anyone who thinks they weren’t banging is fooling themselves.
•
So it says that some eliminations were discussed with Bravo. Going to say that the week Mike bombed, producers refused to let him be eliminated. Makes sense if you consider the whole body of his work.
• “I’m happy and sad.” Classic Mike.
• I’ll have final thoughts next week when they recap it with the cast.
• What did you think????
Without further delay let’s get on with the show…
• There were “a lot of bad ass cooks,” Eli. I think this season will stand out, at least in my mind, as the one with the deepest cast of contestants. There were five potential winners, and a whole host of other qualified candidates that could throw their weight around with the big dogs. Although my comparison is only based on watching two seasons of Top Chef, so I might not be the authority on this issue.
•
I like the challenge of the first course, where all three chefs have the same ingredients. This gives Michael a chance to backup his claim that Kevin’s food is too simple, since he can really outshine him here. Or it could blow up in his face, if Kevin is able to deliver better flavor with the same ingredients. Bryan will just be Bryan. Speaking of which, I think his brother has a higher ceiling, but Bryan remains at a high level of excellence and avoids the valleys. • Love Michael trying to come up with something nice to say about his helper. I wonder how many takes it took him before he finally arrived at his backhanded compliment. Bryan, on the other hand, basically drooled about working with Jen. Kevin got a wild card, and I’m interested in seeing how Preeti (that might be right) works out. The distribution this way is not fair. I don’t think it necessarily proves who is the Top Chef.
• In the second round of knife drawing Kevin got hosed again and Bryan picked up another winner. Ash is a good follower, which is ok for Kevin, but Bryan got someone super creative in Ashely. (Did I mention my crush on Ashley?). As for Eli going to Mike, I think he’s just happy he didn’t get Robin. Eli is good, but it doesn’t really matter since Mike is going to be so hand’s on. I can’t imagine him delegating too much authority.
• Kevin says he’s getting mad, and I’m worried how that will manifest itself. We could have our first Top Chef murder.
• Love the fact that the chefs expect a curveball. And they get one, in that they get a curveball by not getting a cuveball. Did that make sense? I have trouble with baseball analogies. Knuckleball?
• Mrs. V has some wild eyes! Curveball! Kevin’s mom is obviously Kevin’s mom. Although I wouldn’t have been surprised if she had a beard too. Fastball!
• I feel like some of the Top Chef contestants would make for good television personalities with their own cooking shows. Southern home cooking with Kevin. Creative creations with Mike.
• Here comes a curveball with Tom! Oh, and he hung the ball over the plate with a challenge that isn’t really too hard. Can’t tell if Mike is being genuine about his childhood memories, but if he is then he is winning points in my book. Almost explains why he has this tough outer shell. What an aww moment, and with the most unlikely person.
• I need to give props to Mike again, this time regarding how well thought out his dishes are. This guy is playing to win, and is demonstrating a real strategy.
• Kevin sounds like he planned his dessert with Jim Gaffigan in mind. If you don’t know, that’s a reference to their shared love of bacon. If he really wanted to please Jim he’s make a hot pocket with bacon in it
• Bryan wins. That’s it. Kevin didn’t blow them away with any ideas or execution. Mike’s performance was marred by the low lows. I think Bryan will win.
• “I was the underdog that showed if you fight really hard you can make it, and it just didn’t go all the way.” Love the sentiment Kevin, even if it contradicts itself.
• Damn! I just paused it as Padma said Michael. He won. They’re trying to throw us another one of those curveballs, except we know it is coming. I hope I’m wrong. But I’m not.
• There it is. BOOOOOOOO. BOOOOOOOOOOO. (Ok, he deserved it)
• Wow, this is actually touching. The mom hugging the two boys. The music. Gail. Oh sweet Gail. Tobey even looks choked up. Love that Mike gives a shout out to Padma about emotion. Anyone who thinks they weren’t banging is fooling themselves.
•
So it says that some eliminations were discussed with Bravo. Going to say that the week Mike bombed, producers refused to let him be eliminated. Makes sense if you consider the whole body of his work.
• “I’m happy and sad.” Classic Mike.
• I’ll have final thoughts next week when they recap it with the cast.
• What did you think????
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Lost: Of course there's poison gas
I'm enjoying my third go around with season 4 in Lost, in part because I don't remember these episodes very well. My gist of the season was that they would leave the island during this season, but beyond that there were some big holes in my memory and my understanding of the season.
In particular I was a little unclear about the episode called, The Other Woman. It revolves around Juliet's backstory, which is interesting by itself, but also hints at the fact she won't have a future. Literally just came up with that right now. Everyone else gets a flash forward, if they're making it off the island. I should have known then!
Anyway, the back story isn't that interesting, but the events in real time are quite confusing. WEll maybe not confusing, but at the time I remember not caring for the episode. Now I'm not sure how I feel.
The episode primarily deals with Charlotte and Daniel's attempt to turn the poisonous gas inert. This is the poisonous gas that most likely killed everyone in the Dharma initiative.
First we need to wonder how they knew about it? At this point we're left in the dark, but I assume it Charles Widmore warned them about it.
There are a myriad of other questions and complaints, but they're all trying to escape at once and I don't think i'll be able to articulate my frustration. The episode just feels like a throwaway episode I guess. The plot isn't well explained, and it's not like there is some big payoff later on that they were setting us up for.
So I guess, eh. Whatever. It just sucks to waste an episode in a season that was shortened because of the strike. Although, I kind of wonder if there would have been more time fillers if the strike hadn't happened.
We'll leave you with this hot, but not relevant picture.
In particular I was a little unclear about the episode called, The Other Woman. It revolves around Juliet's backstory, which is interesting by itself, but also hints at the fact she won't have a future. Literally just came up with that right now. Everyone else gets a flash forward, if they're making it off the island. I should have known then!
Anyway, the back story isn't that interesting, but the events in real time are quite confusing. WEll maybe not confusing, but at the time I remember not caring for the episode. Now I'm not sure how I feel.
The episode primarily deals with Charlotte and Daniel's attempt to turn the poisonous gas inert. This is the poisonous gas that most likely killed everyone in the Dharma initiative.
First we need to wonder how they knew about it? At this point we're left in the dark, but I assume it Charles Widmore warned them about it.
There are a myriad of other questions and complaints, but they're all trying to escape at once and I don't think i'll be able to articulate my frustration. The episode just feels like a throwaway episode I guess. The plot isn't well explained, and it's not like there is some big payoff later on that they were setting us up for.
So I guess, eh. Whatever. It just sucks to waste an episode in a season that was shortened because of the strike. Although, I kind of wonder if there would have been more time fillers if the strike hadn't happened.
We'll leave you with this hot, but not relevant picture.
Jersey Shore: Create your own reality
Let me first declare my love for the concept of MTV’s new reality show, THE JERSEY SHORE. I think my interest originally stemmed from the potential for comedy on this show, but in honor of full disclosure I must admit I am wildly attracted to these type of girls.
You know the ones I mean. They’re buxom. Usually with fake blond hair or do something goofy with their hair, whether it’s a huge bun or extensions. Oh, and those clothes! It’s like they’ve heard of sluts, but fail to grasp they’re presenting themselves as one. I love it.
But I’m not totally superficial, because I love their attitudes. They’re all about having a good time and with very little thinking. I enjoy turning my brain off.
I have never hooked up with or realistically pursued a girl who could be on the Jersey Shore, and for that I’m eternally disappointed. I guess there is still time for me to get a six pack, embrace my Italian roots and pour gel into my hair like it’s on fire. Alas, I fear this reality, where I’m hob knobbing it with the type of girls my friend Alex mocks me about, shall never come to fruition.
What’s nice about these girls, which apparently are prevalent on the Jersey Shore, is that they’re not limited to the Jersey Shore. I can think of two off the top of my head who fit the mold from my high school. Wherever you’re from you probably know this type of girl. Tell me you’re not in love with them, just a little bit, and I’ll call you a liar.
So this was my initial attraction to the show, yet what convinced me to tune in for real was Bill Simmons’ positive recommendation. That just put me over the edge.
So here are some Jersey Shore thoughts…
• The people in this house are going to create a new form of VD that will kill us all. It will be immune to antibiotics and will eventually become so powerful that Sammie Sweetheart will become attracted to it.
• Love Vinny’s understanding of the world. He definitely is the most self-aware. He just chooses this lifestyle. His assessment of everyone in the house is the closest to my thoughts on the people. Love that he doesn’t think Sammie is hot and I love that he immediately realized he would want the isolated room. Vinny is going to either stick out like a sore thumb because he’s a little different or the other morons (that’s the equivalent to Guido) will be fascinated with him and they’ll all get along. I’d say 30% chance someone comes into his confessional after overhearing him and punches him in the face.
• Snooki is the ugliest girl on the show. She looks old, unattractive and suburned. Ok, they all look a little burned, but it’s not natural light so I’m sure it’s fine.
Anyway, I’m going to cringe every time she is on because I hate girls who think they’re insanely hot and look like a heavy set version of Christina Aguilera if she was kicked in the face by a horse and then decided to emulate that horse’s facial expressions as a sign of respect. That being said (Oh Larry David), I would still hook up with her. She’s also a runaway drunk, which I respect.
• Ronny, or ten-pack guy who could kill my whole family, doesn’t seem inclined to wear a shirt. I have no problem with that, since he has a good body. I also appreciate his world view, which primarily revolves around getting laid. I respect that. He’s a simple man. Actually he might not be simple, but his interests are. Very zen. The Phil Jackson of the house.
• “Wear a thong bikini, that’s a little more classy…If you know what I mean.”-Angelina
• Mike and Sammie are holding hands! This romance may not be long lasting, but I’m rooting for these two crazy kids. Their holding of hands seems a little strange. Who knew these kids were so sentimental.
• I could probably do without hearing Snookie throwing up.
• Maybe I’m missing something, but I’m not sure why anyone in the house would be concerned about their “job” and take it seriously. Do you have to leave the show if you get fired? Can you get promoted? Probably my least favorite part of the show, except for the fact it serves to remind us who can and can’t function in the real world.
• Pretty sure I’m in love with Sammie. Yeah, she’s sort of self-aware and is my kind of hot. The total package, maybe? In reality she’s really not that hot. Her close-ups are not doing her any favors.
• “Me, I’m on the outcast.” –Snookie
• Wow, I legitimately like Vinny, Mike and Ronnie. I’m only against Pauly D, and that’s just because he’s a bigot. He can redeem himself! The girls all basically suck, except for Sammie, but her stock is dropping fast.
• So Ronnie referred to Angelina as Jolie. Took me a legit twenty second to figure that nickname out. Love it. Love, love, love it. It is only topped by the fact that Snooki’s dad encourages her to stay on this show. I wonder what his “#1 Dad” mug looks like.
• They lift weights? What? Huh. If they’re going to show that, will they also show their steroid sessions?
•
You know the ones I mean. They’re buxom. Usually with fake blond hair or do something goofy with their hair, whether it’s a huge bun or extensions. Oh, and those clothes! It’s like they’ve heard of sluts, but fail to grasp they’re presenting themselves as one. I love it.
But I’m not totally superficial, because I love their attitudes. They’re all about having a good time and with very little thinking. I enjoy turning my brain off.
I have never hooked up with or realistically pursued a girl who could be on the Jersey Shore, and for that I’m eternally disappointed. I guess there is still time for me to get a six pack, embrace my Italian roots and pour gel into my hair like it’s on fire. Alas, I fear this reality, where I’m hob knobbing it with the type of girls my friend Alex mocks me about, shall never come to fruition.
What’s nice about these girls, which apparently are prevalent on the Jersey Shore, is that they’re not limited to the Jersey Shore. I can think of two off the top of my head who fit the mold from my high school. Wherever you’re from you probably know this type of girl. Tell me you’re not in love with them, just a little bit, and I’ll call you a liar.
So this was my initial attraction to the show, yet what convinced me to tune in for real was Bill Simmons’ positive recommendation. That just put me over the edge.
So here are some Jersey Shore thoughts…
• The people in this house are going to create a new form of VD that will kill us all. It will be immune to antibiotics and will eventually become so powerful that Sammie Sweetheart will become attracted to it.
• Love Vinny’s understanding of the world. He definitely is the most self-aware. He just chooses this lifestyle. His assessment of everyone in the house is the closest to my thoughts on the people. Love that he doesn’t think Sammie is hot and I love that he immediately realized he would want the isolated room. Vinny is going to either stick out like a sore thumb because he’s a little different or the other morons (that’s the equivalent to Guido) will be fascinated with him and they’ll all get along. I’d say 30% chance someone comes into his confessional after overhearing him and punches him in the face.
• Snooki is the ugliest girl on the show. She looks old, unattractive and suburned. Ok, they all look a little burned, but it’s not natural light so I’m sure it’s fine.
Anyway, I’m going to cringe every time she is on because I hate girls who think they’re insanely hot and look like a heavy set version of Christina Aguilera if she was kicked in the face by a horse and then decided to emulate that horse’s facial expressions as a sign of respect. That being said (Oh Larry David), I would still hook up with her. She’s also a runaway drunk, which I respect. • Ronny, or ten-pack guy who could kill my whole family, doesn’t seem inclined to wear a shirt. I have no problem with that, since he has a good body. I also appreciate his world view, which primarily revolves around getting laid. I respect that. He’s a simple man. Actually he might not be simple, but his interests are. Very zen. The Phil Jackson of the house.
• “Wear a thong bikini, that’s a little more classy…If you know what I mean.”-Angelina
• Mike and Sammie are holding hands! This romance may not be long lasting, but I’m rooting for these two crazy kids. Their holding of hands seems a little strange. Who knew these kids were so sentimental.
• I could probably do without hearing Snookie throwing up.
• Maybe I’m missing something, but I’m not sure why anyone in the house would be concerned about their “job” and take it seriously. Do you have to leave the show if you get fired? Can you get promoted? Probably my least favorite part of the show, except for the fact it serves to remind us who can and can’t function in the real world.
• Pretty sure I’m in love with Sammie. Yeah, she’s sort of self-aware and is my kind of hot. The total package, maybe? In reality she’s really not that hot. Her close-ups are not doing her any favors.
• “Me, I’m on the outcast.” –Snookie
• Wow, I legitimately like Vinny, Mike and Ronnie. I’m only against Pauly D, and that’s just because he’s a bigot. He can redeem himself! The girls all basically suck, except for Sammie, but her stock is dropping fast.
• So Ronnie referred to Angelina as Jolie. Took me a legit twenty second to figure that nickname out. Love it. Love, love, love it. It is only topped by the fact that Snooki’s dad encourages her to stay on this show. I wonder what his “#1 Dad” mug looks like.
• They lift weights? What? Huh. If they’re going to show that, will they also show their steroid sessions?
•
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)